ECML vs. JPSV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ECML (EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF) and JPSV (Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ECML returned 14.43%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for JPSV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ECML charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for JPSV.

Performance

ECML vs. JPSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) and Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ECML having a 14.84% return and JPSV slightly lower at 14.56%.

ECML

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 14.84%
• 6M: 13.24%
• 1Y: 28.34%
• 3Y*: 14.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JPSV

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 6M: 12.65%
• 1Y: 22.21%
• 3Y*: 13.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECML vs. JPSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	14.84%	6.82%	2.37%	26.00%
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF	14.56%	0.63%	8.73%	17.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ECML and JPSV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.87

The correlation between ECML and JPSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

ECML vs. JPSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ECML	JPSV
Consumer Cyclical	23.1%	9.8%
Healthcare	17.6%	5.2%
Industrials	14.8%	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	12.3%	2.4%
Energy	12.2%	5.2%
Basic Materials	11.7%	4.9%
Technology	4.5%	8.3%
Communication Services	3.8%	6.0%
Utilities	1.4%	5.4%
Financial Services	-	25.3%
Real Estate	-	9.0%

Return for Risk

ECML vs. JPSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECML

ECML Risk / Return Rank: 65
ECML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ECML Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ECML Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ECML Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ECML Martin Ratio Rank: 66

JPSV

JPSV Risk / Return Rank: 44
JPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
JPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
JPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 40
JPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECML vs. JPSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) and Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECML	JPSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.43	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	2.19	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.26	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.06	2.47	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.61	6.68	+4.93

ECML vs. JPSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECML Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the JPSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECML and JPSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ECML vs. JPSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECML drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, which is greater than JPSV's maximum drawdown of -22.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECML and JPSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECML	JPSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.66%	-22.78%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.01%	-9.02%	+2.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.66%	-22.78%	-1.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-0.29%	-1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.80%	-5.55%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	3.33%	-0.88%

Volatility

ECML vs. JPSV - Volatility Comparison

EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF (JPSV) at 3.62%. This indicates that ECML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECML	JPSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	3.62%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.68%	10.05%	-0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.79%	15.60%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.34%	17.86%	+0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.34%	17.86%	+0.48%

ECML vs. JPSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JPSV's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECML vs. JPSV - Dividend Comparison

ECML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than JPSV's 1.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	1.20%	1.38%	0.98%	0.77%
JPSV Jpmorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF	1.24%	1.42%	1.21%	1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECML and JPSV in my portfolio?

ECML and JPSV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ECML or JPSV?

ECML has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to JPSV (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECML dropped -24.66% vs JPSV's -22.78%.

Which ETF is better, ECML or JPSV?

On 3-year performance, ECML leads with 14.43% vs 13.07% for JPSV. On fees, JPSV is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, JPSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ECML or JPSV?

Over the 3-year period, ECML has performed better with a 14.43% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECML or JPSV?

JPSV is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ECML.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECML or JPSV?

JPSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 1.20% for ECML.

What is the main difference between ECML and JPSV?

They also come from different issuers: Euclidean and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ECML and 0.74% for JPSV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.