PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EATZ vs. BETZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EATZ vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EATZ vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
-0.73%-6.67%23.21%25.23%-20.68%-5.06%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
-14.85%15.75%10.22%21.17%-42.02%-20.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EATZ achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -14.85% return.


EATZ

1D
1.62%
1M
-7.59%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-5.70%
1Y
-4.92%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
10Y*

BETZ

1D
3.13%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-14.85%
6M
-21.76%
1Y
-0.63%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
-9.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EATZ vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EATZ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EATZ vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATZ
EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BETZ
BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EATZ vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EATZBETZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

-0.03

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.19

0.13

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.02

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

-0.07

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.38

-0.14

-0.23

EATZ vs. BETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EATZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the BETZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EATZ and BETZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EATZBETZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

-0.03

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.10

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between EATZ and BETZ is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EATZ vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison

EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than BETZ's 5.37% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
0.50%0.50%0.18%0.49%2.35%0.15%0.00%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
5.37%4.57%0.86%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%

Drawdowns

EATZ vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EATZ drawdown since its inception was -34.40%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EATZ and BETZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EATZBETZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.40%

-60.82%

+26.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.21%

-29.20%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.11%

-42.39%

+24.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-33.64%

+20.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.13%

14.06%

-1.93%

Volatility

EATZ vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) is 5.04%, while Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that EATZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EATZBETZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

8.08%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

15.98%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.22%

23.02%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

27.27%

-5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

28.13%

-6.48%