EAT vs. K.TO
EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) and K.TO (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while K.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, EAT returned 14.68%/yr vs 18.69%/yr for K.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EAT vs. K.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EAT is traded in USD, while K.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the K.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly higher than K.TO's -9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed K.TO with an annualized return of 14.68%, while K.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.69% annualized return.
EAT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -8.74%
- 3Y*
- 62.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
K.TO
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -9.88%
- YTD
- -9.10%
- 6M
- -8.09%
- 1Y
- 63.05%
- 3Y*
- 76.47%
- 5Y*
- 28.81%
- 10Y*
- 18.69%
EAT vs. K.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 11.01% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | -9.10% | 205.76% | 55.88% | 52.77% | -27.35% | -20.20% | 56.50% | 46.02% | -25.12% | 38.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and K.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
EAT:
$7.09B
K.TO:
CA$43.06B
EAT:
$10.14
K.TO:
$2.36
EAT:
15.71
K.TO:
10.83
EAT:
0.36
K.TO:
0.14
EAT:
1.27
K.TO:
3.90
EAT:
17.46
K.TO:
3.39
EAT:
$5.73B
K.TO:
$7.97B
EAT:
$3.45B
K.TO:
$4.26B
EAT:
$807.20M
K.TO:
$5.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAT vs. K.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EAT
K.TO
EAT vs. K.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAT | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.24 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 1.77 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 5.33 | -5.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAT vs. K.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, smaller than the maximum K.TO drawdown of -94.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and K.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAT | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.40% | -94.64% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.41% | -37.51% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.92% | -37.51% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.54% | -56.25% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.94% | -68.23% | -16.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | -32.36% | +16.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -61.04% | +36.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.77% | 12.45% | +9.32% |
Volatility
EAT vs. K.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) is 15.23%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a volatility of 18.27%. This indicates that EAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than K.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAT | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.23% | 18.27% | -3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.27% | 39.44% | -3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.95% | 51.25% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.04% | 42.93% | +6.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.13% | 45.97% | +9.16% |
Dividends
EAT vs. K.TO - Dividend Comparison
EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.56% | 0.45% | 1.23% | 2.04% | 2.68% | 1.63% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EAT vs. K.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EAT vs. K.TO - Profitability Comparison
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
K.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
K.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
K.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EAT and K.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EAT and K.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer