K.TO vs. AEM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO).
Performance
K.TO vs. AEM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
K.TO vs. AEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 10.14% | 191.81% | 69.10% | 49.15% | -22.64% | -19.94% | 52.79% | 40.00% | -18.82% | 29.36% |
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 21.53% | 109.61% | 58.54% | 6.66% | 8.18% | -22.88% | 13.71% | 46.75% | -3.97% | 3.72% |
Fundamentals
K.TO:
CA$51.40B
AEM.TO:
CA$141.47B
K.TO:
CA$1.97
AEM.TO:
CA$8.89
K.TO:
21.64
AEM.TO:
31.75
K.TO:
0.29
AEM.TO:
0.47
K.TO:
7.35
AEM.TO:
11.91
K.TO:
6.00
AEM.TO:
5.73
K.TO:
CA$7.06B
AEM.TO:
CA$11.93B
K.TO:
CA$3.48B
AEM.TO:
CA$6.82B
K.TO:
CA$4.26B
AEM.TO:
CA$8.18B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a 10.14% return, which is significantly lower than AEM.TO's 21.53% return. Over the past 10 years, K.TO has outperformed AEM.TO with an annualized return of 26.42%, while AEM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 21.73% annualized return.
K.TO
- 1D
- 6.78%
- 1M
- -15.55%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 6M
- 23.45%
- 1Y
- 136.04%
- 3Y*
- 91.09%
- 5Y*
- 39.57%
- 10Y*
- 26.42%
AEM.TO
- 1D
- 5.82%
- 1M
- -17.44%
- YTD
- 21.53%
- 6M
- 20.96%
- 1Y
- 82.98%
- 3Y*
- 63.37%
- 5Y*
- 33.72%
- 10Y*
- 21.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
K.TO vs. AEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
K.TO
AEM.TO
K.TO vs. AEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| K.TO | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 1.95 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.87 | 2.29 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.33 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 3.06 | +1.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.60 | 10.22 | +6.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| K.TO | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 1.95 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.99 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.61 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.23 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between K.TO and AEM.TO is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
K.TO vs. AEM.TO - Dividend Comparison
K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than AEM.TO's 0.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.44% | 0.46% | 1.24% | 2.04% | 2.83% | 2.04% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 0.81% | 0.96% | 1.95% | 2.99% | 2.96% | 3.13% | 1.41% | 0.92% | 1.04% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 1.13% |
Drawdowns
K.TO vs. AEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.68%, which is greater than AEM.TO's maximum drawdown of -84.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and AEM.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| K.TO | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.68% | -84.38% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.96% | -27.98% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.77% | -42.33% | -16.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.19% | -54.60% | -13.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.99% | -18.10% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.08% | -34.24% | -31.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.40% | 8.37% | +0.03% |
Volatility
K.TO vs. AEM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.83% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) at 16.11%. This indicates that K.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| K.TO | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.83% | 16.11% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.93% | 34.96% | +4.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.50% | 42.78% | +6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.76% | 34.40% | +7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.19% | 35.99% | +10.20% |
Financials
K.TO vs. AEM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
K.TO vs. AEM.TO - Profitability Comparison
K.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.
AEM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.18B and revenue of 3.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.2%.
K.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 985.01M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.
AEM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.09B and revenue of 3.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.
K.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 920.43M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 44.8%.
AEM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.62B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.