K.TO vs. FNV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: K.TO or FNV.TO.
Key characteristics
| K.TO | FNV.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 66.12% | 11.10% |
| 1Y Return | 84.20% | -0.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 16.67% | -3.56% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 20.64% | 5.12% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 16.69% | 11.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.25 | -0.06 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.80 | 0.09 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 1.01 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.02 | -0.05 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.08 | -0.20 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.95% | 7.84% |
| Daily Std Dev | 37.34% | 25.89% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.68% | -47.77% |
| Current Drawdown | -64.35% | -23.66% |
Fundamentals
| K.TO | FNV.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$16.28B | CA$31.58B |
| EPS | CA$0.84 | -CA$4.29 |
| PEG Ratio | -3.90 | 11.81 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$4.85B | CA$1.10B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$1.58B | CA$726.30M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$1.51B | CA$711.24M |
Correlation
The correlation between K.TO and FNV.TO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
K.TO vs. FNV.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a 66.12% return, which is significantly higher than FNV.TO's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, K.TO has outperformed FNV.TO with an annualized return of 16.69%, while FNV.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
K.TO vs. FNV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
K.TO vs. FNV.TO - Dividend Comparison
K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than FNV.TO's 0.88% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.91% | 1.50% | 2.17% | 1.63% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.72% |
FNV.TO Franco-Nevada Corporation | 0.88% | 0.93% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.65% | 0.74% | 1.32% | 0.91% | 1.08% | 1.31% | 1.36% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
K.TO vs. FNV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.68%, which is greater than FNV.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and FNV.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
K.TO vs. FNV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.69% compared to Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO) at 9.66%. This indicates that K.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
K.TO vs. FNV.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Franco-Nevada Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities