EAT vs. CCO.TO
EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) and CCO.TO (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while CCO.TO operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, EAT returned 14.68%/yr vs 25.52%/yr for CCO.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EAT vs. CCO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EAT is traded in USD, while CCO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CCO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly higher than CCO.TO's 9.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed CCO.TO with an annualized return of 14.68%, while CCO.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 25.52% annualized return.
EAT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -8.74%
- 3Y*
- 62.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
CCO.TO
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 9.98%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 51.89%
- 3Y*
- 47.76%
- 5Y*
- 36.56%
- 10Y*
- 25.52%
EAT vs. CCO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 11.01% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation | 9.98% | 78.52% | 19.50% | 91.06% | 5.05% | 62.26% | 52.26% | -21.75% | 23.60% | -8.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and CCO.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
EAT:
$7.09B
CCO.TO:
CA$61.44B
EAT:
$10.14
CCO.TO:
CA$1.49
EAT:
15.71
CCO.TO:
94.41
EAT:
0.36
CCO.TO:
0.79
EAT:
1.27
CCO.TO:
17.36
EAT:
17.46
CCO.TO:
8.70
EAT:
$5.73B
CCO.TO:
CA$3.54B
EAT:
$3.45B
CCO.TO:
CA$1.13B
EAT:
$807.20M
CCO.TO:
CA$818.74M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAT vs. CCO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EAT
CCO.TO
EAT vs. CCO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAT | CCO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.20 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 1.86 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 4.54 | -4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAT vs. CCO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, roughly equal to the maximum CCO.TO drawdown of -87.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and CCO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAT | CCO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.40% | -87.72% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.41% | -28.99% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.92% | -40.43% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.54% | -40.43% | -25.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.94% | -56.56% | -28.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | -24.48% | +8.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -51.22% | +26.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.77% | 11.83% | +9.94% |
Volatility
EAT vs. CCO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) is 15.23%, while Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) has a volatility of 17.58%. This indicates that EAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAT | CCO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.23% | 17.58% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.27% | 38.85% | -2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.95% | 54.34% | -7.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.04% | 48.56% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.13% | 45.66% | +9.47% |
Dividends
EAT vs. CCO.TO - Dividend Comparison
EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.21% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.47% | 0.69% | 0.52% | 3.45% | 2.85% | 2.34% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
Financials
EAT vs. CCO.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EAT vs. CCO.TO - Profitability Comparison
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
CCO.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 290.25M and revenue of 845.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
CCO.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 153.89M and revenue of 845.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
CCO.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 130.75M and revenue of 845.37M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EAT and CCO.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EAT and CCO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer