PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CCO.TO vs. CNQ.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CCO.TOCNQ.TO
YTD Return26.97%13.70%
1Y Return23.80%12.11%
3Y Return (Ann)28.55%29.09%
5Y Return (Ann)43.31%26.91%
10Y Return (Ann)14.20%11.69%
Sharpe Ratio0.580.53
Sortino Ratio1.060.88
Omega Ratio1.131.11
Calmar Ratio0.720.65
Martin Ratio1.761.36
Ulcer Index13.93%10.11%
Daily Std Dev42.34%25.81%
Max Drawdown-83.92%-79.68%
Current Drawdown-9.47%-13.27%

Fundamentals


CCO.TOCNQ.TO
Market CapCA$31.57BCA$100.80B
EPSCA$0.26CA$3.52
PE Ratio279.0013.55
PEG Ratio1.940.33
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$2.80BCA$37.25B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$593.42MCA$10.84B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$427.12MCA$12.66B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CCO.TO and CNQ.TO is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CCO.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CCO.TO achieves a 26.97% return, which is significantly higher than CNQ.TO's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CCO.TO has outperformed CNQ.TO with an annualized return of 14.20%, while CNQ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.26%
-7.50%
CCO.TO
CNQ.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CCO.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCO.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CCO.TO, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CCO.TO, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CCO.TO, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CCO.TO, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.70
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CCO.TO, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.67
CNQ.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNQ.TO, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNQ.TO, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNQ.TO, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNQ.TO, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNQ.TO, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.26

CCO.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is comparable to the CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCO.TO and CNQ.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.54
0.47
CCO.TO
CNQ.TO

Dividends

CCO.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

CCO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than CNQ.TO's 4.37% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CCO.TO
Cameco Corporation
0.12%0.16%0.29%0.22%0.35%1.21%0.39%2.76%2.28%1.82%1.84%1.72%
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
4.37%4.26%6.08%3.66%4.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CCO.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCO.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.92%, which is greater than CNQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -79.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCO.TO and CNQ.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-10.27%
-14.78%
CCO.TO
CNQ.TO

Volatility

CCO.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.28% compared to Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) at 7.25%. This indicates that CCO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.28%
7.25%
CCO.TO
CNQ.TO

Financials

CCO.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items