PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EASG vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EASG vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 15.96% return.


EASG

1D
0.53%
1M
3.42%
YTD
8.96%
6M
11.59%
1Y
18.95%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*

VEA

1D
0.63%
1M
5.24%
YTD
15.96%
6M
19.86%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASG vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
8.96%25.19%2.26%18.80%-16.94%11.36%10.73%23.66%-5.41%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
15.96%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EASG and VEA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018

0.96

The correlation between EASG and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

EASG vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EASG
VEA

Financial Services

23.5%
23.3%

Industrials

18.5%
19.2%

Technology

12.8%
13.8%

Healthcare

10.3%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
5.6%

Basic Materials

6.0%
7.5%

Communication Services

5.6%
3.4%

Utilities

4.7%
3.3%

Energy

3.4%
5.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.7%

Financial Services

EASG
23.5%
VEA
23.3%

Industrials

EASG
18.5%
VEA
19.2%

Technology

EASG
12.8%
VEA
13.8%

Healthcare

EASG
10.3%
VEA
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EASG
6.8%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

EASG
6.6%
VEA
5.6%

Basic Materials

EASG
6.0%
VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

EASG
5.6%
VEA
3.4%

Utilities

EASG
4.7%
VEA
3.3%

Energy

EASG
3.4%
VEA
5.4%

Real Estate

EASG
2.0%
VEA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EASG vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EASG
EASG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EASG vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EASGVEADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

2.10

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

2.89

-1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.94

-1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.39

11.50

-5.11

EASG vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASG Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASG and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EASGVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.10

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.61

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.25

+0.27

Drawdowns

EASG vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EASGVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.06%

-60.68%

+28.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-11.63%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.14%

-13.45%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.42%

-29.71%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-13.29%

+7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.98%

+0.19%

Volatility

EASG vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) is 5.03%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that EASG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EASGVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

5.73%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

13.30%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

15.66%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

16.55%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

17.36%

+0.99%

EASG vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EASG vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than VEA's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
3.84%4.18%2.93%2.51%2.47%2.69%1.70%2.94%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.59%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, EASG and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to EASG (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 10.01% vs 7.13% for EASG. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EASG has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.01% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for EASG.

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 2.59% for VEA.

EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EASG and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer