EASG vs. EPIN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) and EPIN (Harbor International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. EASG is passively managed, while EPIN is actively managed. Over the past year, EASG returned 23.37% vs 38.00% for EPIN. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EASG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for EPIN.

Performance

EASG vs. EPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly lower than EPIN's 23.34% return.

EASG

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 5.95%
• YTD: 11.08%
• 1Y: 23.37%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 7.51%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.53%

EPIN

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -0.70%
• 6M: 14.34%
• YTD: 23.34%
• 1Y: 38.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 34.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	$107.99K	$79.19K	$91.05K
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	$41.81K	$24.58K	$20.32K

EASG vs. EPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	11.08%	9.61%
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	23.34%	14.36%

Correlation

The correlation between EASG and EPIN is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.87

The correlation between EASG and EPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

EASG vs. EPIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EASG	EPIN
Financial Services	24.7%	19.1%
Industrials	17.5%	20.6%
Technology	14.8%	29.6%
Healthcare	11.0%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	3.6%
Basic Materials	5.7%	7.1%
Communication Services	5.2%	1.0%
Utilities	3.7%	-
Energy	2.7%	3.8%
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

EASG vs. EPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EASG

EASG Risk / Return Rank: 59
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

EPIN

EPIN Risk / Return Rank: 83
EPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
EPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EASG vs. EPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EASG	EPIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.95	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.66	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.35	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	3.20	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.39	11.52	-4.14

EASG vs. EPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASG Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the EPIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASG and EPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EASG vs. EPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, which is greater than EPIN's maximum drawdown of -11.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and EPIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EASG	EPIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.06%	-11.64%	-20.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.74%	-11.64%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-2.49%	+1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.09%	-1.93%	-4.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	3.23%	-0.11%

Volatility

EASG vs. EPIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) is 4.39%, while Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that EASG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EASG	EPIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	5.55%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.55%	16.99%	-3.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.16%	19.13%	-2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.78%	18.37%	-1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.32%	18.37%	-0.05%

EASG vs. EPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EPIN's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

EASG vs. EPIN - Dividend Comparison

EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than EPIN's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	3.83%	4.18%	2.93%	2.51%	2.47%	2.69%	1.70%	2.94%	0.85%
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	0.64%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EASG and EPIN in my portfolio?

EASG and EPIN have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EASG or EPIN?

EPIN has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to EASG (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs EPIN's -11.64%.

Which ETF is better, EASG or EPIN?

On 1-year performance, EPIN leads with 38.00% vs 23.37% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, EASG has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EASG or EPIN?

Over the 1-year period, EPIN has performed better with a 38.00% return vs 23.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EASG or EPIN?

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EASG or EPIN?

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.64% for EPIN.

What is the main difference between EASG and EPIN?

They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.80% for EPIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.