DYTA vs. NTSI
DYTA (SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF) and NTSI (WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DYTA returned 12.19%/yr vs 14.71%/yr for NTSI. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYTA charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for NTSI.
Performance
DYTA vs. NTSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYTA achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than NTSI's 7.91% return.
DYTA
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSI
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 20.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- —
DYTA vs. NTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | 8.51% | 6.95% | 13.59% | 8.73% |
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 7.91% | 30.37% | 1.11% | 6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYTA and NTSI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2023 | 0.69 |
The correlation between DYTA and NTSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYTA vs. NTSI — Risk / Return Rank
DYTA
NTSI
DYTA vs. NTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYTA | NTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.25 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.68 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 6.15 | +2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYTA | NTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 1.39 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.39 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
DYTA vs. NTSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYTA drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum NTSI drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYTA and NTSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYTA | NTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -34.01% | +24.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -12.33% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.41% | -13.69% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -1.70% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -9.18% | +6.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 3.37% | -1.57% |
Volatility
DYTA vs. NTSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) is 2.81%, while WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that DYTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYTA | NTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 4.72% | -1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 12.61% | -3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.72% | 14.95% | -5.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.83% | 15.68% | -4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.83% | 15.63% | -4.80% |
DYTA vs. NTSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYTA has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSI's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYTA vs. NTSI - Dividend Comparison
DYTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than NTSI's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | 1.51% | 1.64% | 10.80% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 3.48% | 3.65% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.66% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYTA and NTSI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSI has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to DYTA (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYTA dropped -9.41% vs NTSI's -34.01%.
On 3-year performance, NTSI leads with 14.71% vs 12.19% for DYTA. On fees, NTSI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DYTA has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NTSI has performed better with a 14.71% return vs 12.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DYTA.
NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 1.51% for DYTA.
They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for DYTA and 0.26% for NTSI.
DYTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYTA and NTSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer