PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXCM vs. MANH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DXCM vs. MANH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXCM achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than MANH's -17.54% return. Over the past 10 years, DXCM has outperformed MANH with an annualized return of 15.17%, while MANH has yielded a comparatively lower 8.10% annualized return.


DXCM

1D
0.16%
1M
28.68%
YTD
13.56%
6M
12.56%
1Y
-9.03%
3Y*
-15.73%
5Y*
-5.51%
10Y*
15.17%

MANH

1D
1.87%
1M
13.83%
YTD
-17.54%
6M
-17.73%
1Y
-25.90%
3Y*
-9.25%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
8.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXCM vs. MANH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
13.56%-14.66%-37.33%9.58%-15.64%45.23%69.02%82.59%108.75%-3.87%
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
-17.54%-35.87%25.51%77.36%-21.92%47.83%31.89%88.22%-14.47%-6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between DXCM and MANH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2005

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between DXCM and MANH has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DXCM:

$29.67B

MANH:

$8.58B

EPS

DXCM:

$2.31

MANH:

$3.57

PE Ratio

DXCM:

32.57

MANH:

40.03

PEG Ratio

DXCM:

0.77

MANH:

1.90

PS Ratio

DXCM:

6.29

MANH:

7.88

PB Ratio

DXCM:

10.03

MANH:

41.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

DXCM:

$4.82B

MANH:

$1.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DXCM:

$2.96B

MANH:

$456.06M

EBITDA (TTM)

DXCM:

$1.37B

MANH:

$297.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXCM vs. MANH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXCM
DXCM Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DXCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXCM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DXCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXCM Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MANH
MANH Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MANH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MANH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MANH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MANH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MANH Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXCM vs. MANH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DXCMMANHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.91

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

-0.55

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

-0.97

+0.57

DXCM vs. MANH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXCM Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is higher than the MANH Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXCM and MANH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DXCM vs. MANH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXCM drawdown since its inception was -94.61%, which is greater than MANH's maximum drawdown of -87.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXCM and MANH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXCMMANHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.61%

-87.04%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.75%

-46.97%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.95%

-60.98%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.32%

-60.98%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.32%

-60.98%

-5.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.71%

-53.86%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.02%

-39.49%

+3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.77%

26.88%

-4.11%

Volatility

DXCM vs. MANH - Volatility Comparison

DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) have volatilities of 13.27% and 12.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXCMMANHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.27%

12.94%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.48%

32.78%

-7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.74%

38.58%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.98%

38.14%

+8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.43%

39.45%

+8.98%

Dividends

DXCM vs. MANH - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXCM nor MANH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

DXCM vs. MANH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DexCom, Inc. and Manhattan Associates, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.19B
282.22M
(DXCM) Total Revenue
(MANH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DXCM vs. MANH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DexCom, Inc. and Manhattan Associates, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
63.0%
0
Portfolio components
DXCM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a gross profit of 750.30M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

MANH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 282.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DXCM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported an operating income of 255.30M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.

MANH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported an operating income of 64.94M and revenue of 282.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

DXCM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a net income of 199.50M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

MANH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a net income of 49.30M and revenue of 282.22M, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DXCM and MANH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXCM has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to MANH (12.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXCM dropped -94.61% vs MANH's -87.04%.

DXCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXCM and MANH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer