DXCM vs. KLAC
DXCM (DexCom, Inc.) and KLAC (KLA Corporation) are both stocks. DXCM operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while KLAC operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, DXCM returned 13.66%/yr vs 39.77%/yr for KLAC. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
DXCM vs. KLAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXCM achieves a 25.73% return, which is significantly lower than KLAC's 50.85% return. Over the past 10 years, DXCM has underperformed KLAC with an annualized return of 13.66%, while KLAC has yielded a comparatively higher 39.77% annualized return.
DXCM
- 1D
- 11.95%
- 1M
- 21.19%
- 6M
- 14.25%
- YTD
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- -11.89%
- 5Y*
- -8.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.87%
KLAC
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -31.32%
- 6M
- 28.36%
- YTD
- 50.85%
- 1Y
- 109.32%
- 3Y*
- 53.92%
- 5Y*
- 40.75%
- 10Y*
- 39.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | $381.17M | $359.84M | $403.63M |
KLAC KLA Corporation | $2.50B | $2.71B | $2.78B |
DXCM vs. KLAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 25.73% | -14.66% | -37.33% | 9.58% | -15.64% | 45.23% | 69.02% | 82.59% | 108.75% | -3.87% |
KLAC KLA Corporation | 50.85% | 94.48% | 9.36% | 56.05% | -11.20% | 68.05% | 47.94% | 103.99% | -12.49% | 36.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXCM and KLAC is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2005 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DXCM and KLAC has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
DXCM:
$32.20B
KLAC:
$238.81B
DXCM:
$2.51
KLAC:
$3.66
DXCM:
33.22
KLAC:
49.92
DXCM:
0.79
KLAC:
3.11
DXCM:
6.68
KLAC:
17.76
DXCM:
12.47
KLAC:
37.86
DXCM:
$4.97B
KLAC:
$13.58B
DXCM:
$3.12B
KLAC:
$8.32B
DXCM:
$1.41B
KLAC:
$6.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXCM vs. KLAC — Risk / Return Rank
DXCM
KLAC
DXCM vs. KLAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXCM | KLAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.31 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 2.52 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.19 | 9.80 | -9.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXCM vs. KLAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXCM drawdown since its inception was -94.61%, which is greater than KLAC's maximum drawdown of -83.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXCM and KLAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXCM | KLAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.61% | -83.74% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.33% | -43.59% | +10.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.95% | -43.59% | -17.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -43.59% | -22.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.32% | -43.59% | -22.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.75% | -39.41% | -9.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.14% | -29.29% | -6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.53% | 11.20% | +6.33% |
Volatility
DXCM vs. KLAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) is 15.95%, while KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a volatility of 22.35%. This indicates that DXCM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXCM | KLAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.95% | 22.35% | -6.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.74% | 51.87% | -22.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.91% | 59.59% | -16.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.22% | 46.07% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.66% | 43.21% | +5.45% |
Dividends
DXCM vs. KLAC - Dividend Comparison
DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KLAC KLA Corporation | 0.44% | 0.61% | 0.96% | 0.92% | 1.25% | 0.91% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 3.17% | 2.15% | 2.67% | 2.94% |
Financials
DXCM vs. KLAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DexCom, Inc. and KLA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DXCM vs. KLAC - Profitability Comparison
DXCM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a gross profit of 830.00M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.4%.
KLAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.24B and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.4%.
DXCM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported an operating income of 318.30M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.
KLAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.
DXCM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a net income of 249.10M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.
KLAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.36B and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 37.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DXCM and KLAC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KLAC has higher volatility (22.35%) compared to DXCM (15.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXCM dropped -94.61% vs KLAC's -83.74%.
KLAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXCM and KLAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer