PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWM vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWM vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWM achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 5.99% return. Over the past 10 years, DWM has outperformed EFAV with an annualized return of 8.63%, while EFAV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.


DWM

1D
-0.91%
1M
0.02%
6M
4.95%
YTD
8.22%
1Y
18.52%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
8.63%

EFAV

1D
0.12%
1M
0.61%
6M
4.32%
YTD
5.99%
1Y
11.32%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
6.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWM vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWM
WisdomTree International Equity Fund
8.22%34.83%4.15%16.63%-9.04%10.76%-2.33%18.98%-13.53%24.08%
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
5.99%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DWM and EFAV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.89

The correlation between DWM and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWM vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWM
EFAV

Industrials

18.9%
15.9%

Financial Services

18.1%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
5.0%

Healthcare

8.1%
12.0%

Technology

7.7%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
11.9%

Basic Materials

5.5%
1.5%

Utilities

5.2%
8.8%

Communication Services

4.7%
9.6%

Energy

3.8%
8.3%

Real Estate

2.8%
3.0%

Industrials

DWM
18.9%
EFAV
15.9%

Financial Services

DWM
18.1%
EFAV
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DWM
9.6%
EFAV
5.0%

Healthcare

DWM
8.1%
EFAV
12.0%

Technology

DWM
7.7%
EFAV
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

DWM
6.9%
EFAV
11.9%

Basic Materials

DWM
5.5%
EFAV
1.5%

Utilities

DWM
5.2%
EFAV
8.8%

Communication Services

DWM
4.7%
EFAV
9.6%

Energy

DWM
3.8%
EFAV
8.3%

Real Estate

DWM
2.8%
EFAV
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWM vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWM
DWM Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWM vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWMEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.71

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.10

4.00

+2.09

DWM vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWM and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWM vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWM drawdown since its inception was -62.10%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWM and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWMEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.10%

-27.56%

-34.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-6.66%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-8.75%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-27.46%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.82%

-27.56%

-10.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-3.64%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.44%

-4.77%

-8.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.83%

+0.22%

Volatility

DWM vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) at 3.44%. This indicates that DWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWMEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.44%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

8.79%

+3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

10.70%

+3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

11.84%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

13.02%

+3.23%

DWM vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWM vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

DWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than EFAV's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWM
WisdomTree International Equity Fund
2.77%3.06%3.86%4.15%4.36%3.64%2.74%3.46%3.86%2.99%3.43%3.55%
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
3.18%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWM and EFAV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWM has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to EFAV (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWM dropped -62.10% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 10-year performance, DWM leads with 8.63% vs 6.15% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DWM has performed better with a 8.63% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DWM.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.77% for DWM.

DWM tracks WisdomTree International Equity Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DWM and 0.20% for EFAV.

DWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWM and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer