DWM vs. SCHF
DWM (WisdomTree International Equity Fund) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DWM tracks the WisdomTree International Equity Index while SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DWM returned 9.36%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for SCHF. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DWM charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
DWM vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWM achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, DWM has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 9.36%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.18% annualized return.
DWM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 36.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
DWM vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWM WisdomTree International Equity Fund | 8.70% | 34.83% | 4.15% | 16.63% | -9.04% | 10.76% | -2.33% | 18.98% | -13.53% | 24.08% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 17.68% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWM and SCHF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.96 |
The correlation between DWM and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWM vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWM
SCHF
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
DWM
SCHF
Financial Services
DWM
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
DWM
SCHF
Healthcare
DWM
SCHF
Technology
DWM
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
DWM
SCHF
Basic Materials
DWM
SCHF
Utilities
DWM
SCHF
Communication Services
DWM
SCHF
Energy
DWM
SCHF
Real Estate
DWM
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWM vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
DWM
SCHF
DWM vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.40 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 3.18 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.76 | 12.22 | -4.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWM vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWM drawdown since its inception was -62.10%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWM and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.10% | -34.87% | -27.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -11.48% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | -13.41% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.64% | -29.14% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.82% | -34.87% | -2.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | 0.00% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.47% | -7.36% | -6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.98% | +0.03% |
Volatility
DWM vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) is 4.02%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that DWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 6.42% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.25% | 14.43% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 16.63% | -2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 16.55% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 17.21% | -0.66% |
DWM vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWM vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
DWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than SCHF's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWM WisdomTree International Equity Fund | 2.73% | 3.06% | 3.86% | 4.15% | 4.36% | 3.64% | 2.74% | 3.46% | 3.86% | 2.99% | 3.43% | 3.55% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.90% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DWM and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to DWM (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWM dropped -62.10% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 11.18% vs 9.36% for DWM. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 9.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DWM.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.73% for DWM.
DWM tracks WisdomTree International Equity Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DWM and 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWM and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer