DWM vs. EFAS
DWM (WisdomTree International Equity Fund) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DWM tracks the WisdomTree International Equity Index while EFAS tracks the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWM returned 9.61%/yr vs 12.04%/yr for EFAS. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWM charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.
Performance
DWM vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWM achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 12.96% return.
DWM
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 20.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
EFAS
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- —
DWM vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWM WisdomTree International Equity Fund | 7.43% | 34.83% | 4.15% | 16.63% | -9.04% | 10.76% | -2.33% | 18.98% | -13.53% | 24.08% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 12.96% | 46.83% | 3.07% | 14.65% | -8.00% | 12.75% | -5.42% | 14.60% | -11.60% | 22.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWM and EFAS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DWM and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWM vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWM
EFAS
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
DWM
EFAS
Financial Services
DWM
EFAS
Consumer Cyclical
DWM
EFAS
Healthcare
DWM
EFAS
Technology
DWM
EFAS
Consumer Defensive
DWM
EFAS
Communication Services
DWM
EFAS
Utilities
DWM
EFAS
Basic Materials
DWM
EFAS
Energy
DWM
EFAS
Real Estate
DWM
EFAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWM vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank
DWM
EFAS
DWM vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWM | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.47 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 5.44 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 14.48 | -7.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWM | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.73 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.78 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.56 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
DWM vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWM drawdown since its inception was -62.10%, which is greater than EFAS's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWM and EFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWM | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.10% | -44.38% | -17.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -5.30% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | -11.84% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.64% | -28.81% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -3.01% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.50% | -7.08% | -6.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 1.99% | +0.97% |
Volatility
DWM vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.96%. This indicates that DWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWM | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 2.96% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | 8.20% | +3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 10.60% | +3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.28% | 15.59% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 18.33% | -1.74% |
DWM vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWM vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison
DWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than EFAS's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWM WisdomTree International Equity Fund | 2.76% | 3.06% | 3.86% | 4.15% | 4.36% | 3.64% | 2.74% | 3.46% | 3.86% | 2.99% | 3.43% | 3.55% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 5.05% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWM and EFAS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWM has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to EFAS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWM dropped -62.10% vs EFAS's -44.38%.
On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.04% vs 9.61% for DWM. On fees, DWM is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DWM is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 2.76% for DWM.
DWM tracks WisdomTree International Equity Index, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DWM and 0.56% for EFAS.
EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWM and EFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer