DWAW vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DWAW (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWAW charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

DWAW vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a 14.00% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 57.26% return.

DWAW

• 1D: -3.01%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 14.00%
• 6M: 13.09%
• 1Y: 24.71%
• 3Y*: 18.75%
• 5Y*: 7.55%
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -6.25%
• 1M: -10.39%
• YTD: 57.26%
• 6M: 44.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAW vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF	14.00%	1.73%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	57.26%	-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAW and MEME is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.63

DWAW vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DWAW	MEME
Technology	33.0%	66.7%
Financial Services	17.5%	5.5%
Industrials	11.3%	22.3%
Healthcare	7.7%	5.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	-
Communication Services	6.0%	5.5%
Basic Materials	4.5%	4.6%
Energy	4.5%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	-
Utilities	2.8%	4.9%
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

DWAW vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAW

DWAW Risk / Return Rank: 47
DWAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
DWAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DWAW Omega Ratio Rank: 46
DWAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DWAW Martin Ratio Rank: 53

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAW vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DWAW	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.53	—	—

Drawdowns

DWAW vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWAW	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.55%	-48.78%	+17.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.01%	-17.37%	+14.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.90%	-28.63%	+17.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DWAW	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.78%	75.52%	-58.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.30%	75.52%	-56.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.57%	75.52%	-50.95%

DWAW vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWAW vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF	0.67%	0.76%	0.00%	1.70%	0.53%	1.45%	0.16%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWAW and MEME in my portfolio?

DWAW and MEME have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DWAW or MEME?

On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWAW or MEME?

MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for DWAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWAW or MEME?

DWAW has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between DWAW and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for DWAW and 0.69% for MEME.