DWAW vs. GQGU
DWAW (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. DWAW charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
DWAW vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a 14.00% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 4.84% return.
DWAW
- 1D
- -3.01%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 14.00%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 24.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWAW vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 14.00% | 8.23% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 4.84% | -1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAW and GQGU is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAW vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
DWAW
GQGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DWAW vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWAW | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWAW vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAW | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.55% | -8.41% | -23.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -6.23% | +3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -2.71% | -8.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility
DWAW vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAW | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 10.54% | +6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 10.54% | +8.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 10.54% | +14.03% |
DWAW vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAW vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than GQGU's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 0.53% | 1.45% | 0.16% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAW and GQGU have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for DWAW.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.67% for DWAW.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for DWAW and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for DWAW and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer