DWAW vs. GQGU
DWAW (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. DWAW charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
DWAW vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a 16.75% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 7.74% return.
DWAW
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 8.79%
- YTD
- 16.75%
- 6M
- 18.34%
- 1Y
- 27.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWAW vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 16.75% | 7.61% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 7.74% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAW and GQGU is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAW vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
DWAW
GQGU
DWAW vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWAW | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.45 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAW | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.73 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
DWAW vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAW | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.55% | -6.65% | -24.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.64% | +3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -2.53% | -8.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | — | — |
Volatility
DWAW vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAW | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 10.10% | +5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 10.10% | +9.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 10.10% | +12.32% |
DWAW vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAW vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than GQGU's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 0.65% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 0.53% | 1.45% | 0.16% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAW and GQGU have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for DWAW.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.65% for DWAW.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for DWAW and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for DWAW and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer