PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DVYA vs. KBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DVYA vs. KBA

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

DVYA (iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF) and KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DVYA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index, while KBA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DVYA returned 6.57%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for KBA. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DVYA charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KBA.

Performance

DVYA vs. KBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVYA achieves a 17.53% return, which is significantly higher than KBA's 6.21% return. Over the past 10 years, DVYA has underperformed KBA with an annualized return of 6.57%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.23% annualized return.

DVYA

1D
-0.65%
1M
6.67%
6M
7.83%
YTD
17.53%
1Y
33.61%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
6.57%
ALL TIME*
5.46%

KBA

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.24%
6M
7.78%
YTD
6.21%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
9.23%
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

DVYA

iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
$231.55K$344.93K$287.92K

KBA

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
$823.16K$863.47K$2.10M

DVYA vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF		17.53%30.22%6.05%13.75%-2.17%3.41%-9.61%14.70%-14.87%16.99%
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF		6.21%33.88%15.73%-16.77%-3.49%3.17%41.62%35.44%-26.28%30.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DVYA and KBA is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2014

0.44

DVYA vs. KBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DVYA
KBA

Financial Services

34.1%
16.9%

Basic Materials

15.4%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
4.1%

Real Estate

9.6%
0.4%

Industrials

6.3%
14.4%

Energy

5.0%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.8%

Communication Services

4.3%
1.2%

Utilities

4.2%
3.2%

Healthcare

3.7%
4.0%

Technology

1.6%
37.5%

Financial Services

DVYA
34.1%
KBA
16.9%

Basic Materials

DVYA
15.4%
KBA
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DVYA
10.9%
KBA
4.1%

Real Estate

DVYA
9.6%
KBA
0.4%

Industrials

DVYA
6.3%
KBA
14.4%

Energy

DVYA
5.0%
KBA
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

DVYA
4.8%
KBA
5.8%

Communication Services

DVYA
4.3%
KBA
1.2%

Utilities

DVYA
4.2%
KBA
3.2%

Healthcare

DVYA
3.7%
KBA
4.0%

Technology

DVYA
1.6%
KBA
37.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF

Often compared with DVYA:
DVYA vs. VYMDVYA vs. DVYEDVYA vs. IDVDVYA vs. CNDVYA vs. BBCADVYA vs. EPDPXDVYA vs. DVY
Often compared with KBA:
KBA vs. ASHRKBA vs. CNYAKBA vs. KGRNKBA vs. EWTKBA vs. MCHIKBA vs. HEZUKBA vs. ASHS

Return for Risk

DVYA vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
DVYA
DVYA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DVYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVYA Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DVYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVYA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
KBA
KBA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
KBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
KBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DVYA vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DVYAKBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.54
1.59

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.41
2.22

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.28

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

3.97

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

9.40

+2.18

DVYA vs. KBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVYA Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the KBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVYA and KBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DVYA vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVYA drawdown since its inception was -45.61%, smaller than the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVYA and KBA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DVYAKBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.61%

-53.24%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-8.33%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-31.23%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

-39.76%

+14.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.61%

-45.32%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-7.29%

+5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-25.53%

+15.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.51%

-0.60%

Volatility

DVYA vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) is 3.43%, while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that DVYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DVYAKBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

7.91%

-4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

16.42%

-5.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

20.87%

-7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

27.34%

-12.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

25.51%

-8.10%

DVYA vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVYA vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison

DVYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than KBA's 1.47% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF		4.41%4.71%5.97%6.48%7.29%5.81%3.66%5.52%6.24%4.74%4.79%5.33%
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF		1.47%1.56%2.18%2.34%49.05%9.07%0.65%1.53%3.77%1.46%6.62%29.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

DVYA and KBA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBA has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to DVYA (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVYA dropped -45.61% vs KBA's -53.24%.

On 10-year performance, KBA leads with 9.23% vs 6.57% for DVYA. On fees, DVYA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DVYA has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KBA has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DVYA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KBA.

DVYA has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 1.47% for KBA.

DVYA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while KBA is China Equities. DVYA tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index, while KBA tracks MSCI China A Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DVYA and 0.60% for KBA.

DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVYA and KBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer