DUNK vs. MEME
DUNK (Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DUNK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.
Performance
DUNK vs. MEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUNK achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 49.84% return.
DUNK
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -3.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEME
- 1D
- -4.72%
- 1M
- -14.61%
- YTD
- 49.84%
- 6M
- 38.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUNK vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUNK Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF | -2.46% | -3.77% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 49.84% | -38.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUNK and MEME is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUNK vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF (DUNK) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUNK vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUNK drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUNK and MEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUNK | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -48.78% | +23.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.50% | -21.27% | +9.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -28.59% | +18.59% |
Volatility
DUNK vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUNK | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 75.53% | -53.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 75.53% | -53.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 75.53% | -53.28% |
DUNK vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUNK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUNK vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison
Neither DUNK nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DUNK and MEME have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DUNK.
DUNK and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Dana and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DUNK and 0.69% for MEME.
Find the right allocation for DUNK and MEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer