DULL vs. RING

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DULL (MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DULL is a Inverse Commodities fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt) (-300%), while RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DULL returned -61.47%/yr vs 47.07%/yr for RING. At a correlation of -0.78, they often move in opposite directions. DULL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RING.

Performance

DULL vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (DULL) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DULL achieves a -29.67% return, which is significantly lower than RING's 0.30% return.

DULL

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: -29.67%
• 6M: -35.43%
• 1Y: -69.39%
• 3Y*: -61.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RING

• 1D: -3.07%
• 1M: -0.66%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 7.49%
• 1Y: 67.87%
• 3Y*: 47.07%
• 5Y*: 19.93%
• 10Y*: 14.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DULL vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DULL MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-29.67%	-80.59%	-51.68%	-29.56%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.30%	164.72%	15.98%	17.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DULL and RING is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2023	-0.78

The correlation between DULL and RING has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.79 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DULL vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DULL

DULL Risk / Return Rank: 2
DULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
DULL Omega Ratio Rank: 1
DULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DULL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 39
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DULL vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (DULL) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DULL	RING	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	1.49	-2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.67	1.87	-3.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.26	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	2.27	-3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	5.85	-7.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DULL vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DULL Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the RING Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DULL and RING, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DULL	RING	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	1.49	-2.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.05	0.10	-1.16

Drawdowns

DULL vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DULL drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, which is greater than RING's maximum drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DULL and RING.

Drawdown Indicators

	DULL	RING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.12%	-79.47%	-17.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-81.97%	-30.11%	-51.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.12%	-30.11%	-67.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.46%	-25.71%	-69.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.30%	-47.41%	-11.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.01%	11.64%	+44.37%

Volatility

DULL vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (DULL) has a higher volatility of 16.82% compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) at 14.98%. This indicates that DULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DULL	RING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.82%	14.98%	+1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.66%	37.38%	+29.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.11%	45.90%	+32.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.97%	36.46%	+21.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.97%	36.53%	+21.44%

DULL vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison

DULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

DULL vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

DULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DULL MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.83%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DULL and RING in my portfolio?

DULL and RING have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DULL or RING?

DULL has higher volatility (16.82%) compared to RING (14.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DULL dropped -97.12% vs RING's -79.47%.

Which ETF is better, DULL or RING?

On 3-year performance, RING leads with 47.07% vs -61.47% for DULL. On fees, RING is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RING has been the lower-risk option at 14.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DULL or RING?

Over the 3-year period, RING has performed better with a 47.07% return vs -61.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DULL or RING?

RING is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DULL or RING?

RING has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for DULL.

What is the main difference between DULL and RING?

DULL is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while RING is Gold. DULL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt) (-300%), while RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: REX and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DULL and 0.39% for RING.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.