DULL vs. DRNZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DULL (MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DULL is a Inverse Commodities fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt) (-300%), while DRNZ is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the VettaFi Drone Index. Both are passively managed. Their -0.36 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DULL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRNZ.

Performance

DULL vs. DRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (DULL) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DULL achieves a -12.16% return, which is significantly lower than DRNZ's -1.62% return.

DULL

• 1D: 4.27%
• 1M: 3.77%
• 6M: 35.38%
• YTD: -12.16%
• 1Y: -61.47%
• 3Y*: -58.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -56.20%

DRNZ

• 1D: 4.88%
• 1M: -7.21%
• 6M: -14.72%
• YTD: -1.62%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRNZ REX Drone ETF	$2.41M	$2.70M	$4.39M
DULL MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	$435.85K	$839.62K	$687.64K

DULL vs. DRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DULL MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-12.16%	-24.32%
DRNZ REX Drone ETF	-1.62%	-12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DULL and DRNZ is -0.36, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025	-0.36

Return for Risk

DULL vs. DRNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DULL

DULL Risk / Return Rank: 3
DULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
DULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
DULL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
DULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DULL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

DRNZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DULL vs. DRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (DULL) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DULL	DRNZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.77	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.23	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	—	—

Drawdowns

DULL vs. DRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DULL drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, which is greater than DRNZ's maximum drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DULL and DRNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DULL	DRNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.12%	-34.12%	-63.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-81.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.33%	-27.02%	-67.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.87%	-14.36%	-46.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	61.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DULL	DRNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.78%	50.74%	+32.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.13%	50.74%	+8.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.13%	50.74%	+8.39%

DULL vs. DRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DRNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DULL vs. DRNZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither DULL nor DRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DULL and DRNZ in my portfolio?

DULL and DRNZ have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DULL or DRNZ?

On fees, DRNZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DULL or DRNZ?

DRNZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DULL or DRNZ?

DULL and DRNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DULL and DRNZ?

DULL is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while DRNZ is Aerospace & Defense. DULL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt) (-300%), while DRNZ tracks VettaFi Drone Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DULL and 0.65% for DRNZ.