DULL vs. RAAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DULL (MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DULL is a Inverse Commodities fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt) (-300%), while RAAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by VanEck. DULL is passively managed, while RAAX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DULL returned -61.47%/yr vs 22.13%/yr for RAAX. At a correlation of -0.58, they often move in opposite directions. DULL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for RAAX.

Performance

DULL vs. RAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (DULL) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DULL achieves a -29.67% return, which is significantly lower than RAAX's 19.15% return.

DULL

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: -29.67%
• 6M: -35.43%
• 1Y: -69.39%
• 3Y*: -61.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RAAX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -1.28%
• YTD: 19.15%
• 6M: 19.65%
• 1Y: 37.19%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 13.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DULL vs. RAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DULL MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-29.67%	-80.59%	-51.68%	-29.56%
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	19.15%	26.74%	12.50%	6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DULL and RAAX is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2023	-0.58

The correlation between DULL and RAAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.71 (1 year) to -0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DULL vs. RAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DULL

DULL Risk / Return Rank: 2
DULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
DULL Omega Ratio Rank: 1
DULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DULL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

RAAX

RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 85
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DULL vs. RAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (DULL) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DULL	RAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	2.75	-3.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.67	3.57	-5.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.50	-0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	5.64	-6.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	21.06	-22.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DULL vs. RAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DULL Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the RAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DULL and RAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DULL	RAAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	2.75	-3.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.05	0.62	-1.67

Drawdowns

DULL vs. RAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DULL drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, which is greater than RAAX's maximum drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DULL and RAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DULL	RAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.12%	-33.91%	-63.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-81.97%	-6.62%	-75.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.12%	-11.59%	-85.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.46%	-2.53%	-92.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.30%	-6.78%	-52.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.01%	1.77%	+54.24%

Volatility

DULL vs. RAAX - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (DULL) has a higher volatility of 16.82% compared to VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) at 2.95%. This indicates that DULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DULL	RAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.82%	2.95%	+13.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.66%	11.58%	+55.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.11%	13.60%	+64.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.97%	15.60%	+42.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.97%	15.76%	+42.21%

DULL vs. RAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RAAX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

DULL vs. RAAX - Dividend Comparison

DULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DULL MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	1.96%	2.34%	1.91%	3.66%	1.53%	8.72%	6.27%	2.37%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DULL and RAAX in my portfolio?

DULL and RAAX have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DULL or RAAX?

DULL has higher volatility (16.82%) compared to RAAX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DULL dropped -97.12% vs RAAX's -33.91%.

Which ETF is better, DULL or RAAX?

On 3-year performance, RAAX leads with 22.13% vs -61.47% for DULL. On fees, RAAX is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, RAAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DULL or RAAX?

Over the 3-year period, RAAX has performed better with a 22.13% return vs -61.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DULL or RAAX?

RAAX is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DULL or RAAX?

RAAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for DULL.

What is the main difference between DULL and RAAX?

DULL is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while RAAX is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: REX and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DULL and 0.78% for RAAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.