DRUP vs. ALTL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) and ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DRUP tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross while ALTL tracks the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRUP returned 8.45%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for ALTL. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

DRUP vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -10.63% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 16.09% return.

DRUP

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -4.41%
• YTD: -10.63%
• 6M: -11.80%
• 1Y: -2.26%
• 3Y*: 14.94%
• 5Y*: 8.45%
• 10Y*: —

ALTL

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 6.45%
• YTD: 16.09%
• 6M: 15.31%
• 1Y: 36.49%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: 5.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRUP vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF	-10.63%	18.18%	23.11%	42.32%	-28.18%	26.13%	26.07%
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	16.09%	16.61%	12.30%	-15.85%	-10.67%	45.30%	35.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DRUP and ALTL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020	0.54

The correlation between DRUP and ALTL shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DRUP vs. ALTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRUP	ALTL
Technology	60.3%	42.5%
Healthcare	18.6%	1.9%
Communication Services	17.7%	3.7%
Financial Services	1.2%	16.7%
Industrials	1.1%	9.7%
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	12.4%
Basic Materials	-	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.0%
Energy	-	1.8%
Real Estate	-	14.8%
Utilities	-	4.0%

Return for Risk

DRUP vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRUP

DRUP Risk / Return Rank: 8
DRUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
DRUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DRUP Omega Ratio Rank: 7
DRUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
DRUP Martin Ratio Rank: 8

ALTL

ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 67
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRUP vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRUP	ALTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	1.80	-1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	2.38	-2.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.33	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	3.75	-3.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.24	12.57	-12.81

DRUP vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRUP Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRUP and ALTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRUP vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, roughly equal to the maximum ALTL drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and ALTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRUP	ALTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.29%	-31.91%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.21%	-9.79%	-13.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.77%	-21.21%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.29%	-31.91%	+0.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.25%	-3.70%	-9.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	-11.49%	+3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.59%	2.91%	+6.68%

Volatility

DRUP vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) is 8.40%, while Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a volatility of 11.57%. This indicates that DRUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRUP	ALTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.40%	11.57%	-3.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.57%	15.19%	+1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.99%	20.52%	-0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.87%	18.97%	+2.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.21%	20.46%	+2.75%

DRUP vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DRUP and ALTL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

DRUP vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	0.88%	0.95%	1.56%	1.28%	1.23%	1.06%	0.75%	0.00%
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	0.51%	0.28%	0.53%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRUP and ALTL in my portfolio?

DRUP and ALTL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRUP or ALTL?

ALTL has higher volatility (11.57%) compared to DRUP (8.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs ALTL's -31.91%.

Which ETF is better, DRUP or ALTL?

On 5-year performance, DRUP leads with 8.45% vs 5.00% for ALTL. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, DRUP has been the lower-risk option at 8.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRUP or ALTL?

Over the 5-year period, DRUP has performed better with a 8.45% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRUP or ALTL?

DRUP and ALTL have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRUP or ALTL?

ALTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.

What is the main difference between DRUP and ALTL?

DRUP tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Pacer.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.