PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRUP vs. ALTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRUP vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 16.90% return.


DRUP

1D
-2.27%
1M
9.28%
YTD
-3.24%
6M
-4.85%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*

ALTL

1D
-0.66%
1M
12.43%
YTD
16.90%
6M
16.56%
1Y
44.84%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRUP vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DRUP
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF
-3.24%18.18%23.11%42.32%-28.18%26.13%24.82%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
16.90%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%33.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DRUP and ALTL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.55

The correlation between DRUP and ALTL shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DRUP vs. ALTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRUP
ALTL

Technology

55.8%
4.6%

Healthcare

20.8%
6.8%

Communication Services

19.8%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
5.7%

Financial Services

1.2%
16.6%

Industrials

1.1%
10.2%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.8%

Energy

-

0.9%

Real Estate

-

14.8%

Utilities

-

26.8%

Technology

DRUP
55.8%
ALTL
4.6%

Healthcare

DRUP
20.8%
ALTL
6.8%

Communication Services

DRUP
19.8%
ALTL
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DRUP
1.3%
ALTL
5.7%

Financial Services

DRUP
1.2%
ALTL
16.6%

Industrials

DRUP
1.1%
ALTL
10.2%

Basic Materials

DRUP

-

ALTL
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

DRUP

-

ALTL
10.8%

Energy

DRUP

-

ALTL
0.9%

Real Estate

DRUP

-

ALTL
14.8%

Utilities

DRUP

-

ALTL
26.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRUP vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRUP
DRUP Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DRUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRUP Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DRUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRUP Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRUP vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRUPALTLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.44

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

4.60

-4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

16.35

-15.42

DRUP vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRUP and ALTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRUPALTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

2.51

-2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.28

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.73

-0.06

Drawdowns

DRUP vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, roughly equal to the maximum ALTL drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and ALTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRUPALTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-31.91%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.21%

-9.79%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.77%

-21.21%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

-31.91%

+0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-0.66%

-5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-11.58%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.25%

2.75%

+6.50%

Volatility

DRUP vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) have volatilities of 7.48% and 7.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRUPALTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

7.26%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

10.97%

+5.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

18.05%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.78%

18.38%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

20.09%

+3.14%

DRUP vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DRUP and ALTL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

DRUP vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
0.94%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%0.00%
DRUP
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.40%0.51%0.28%0.53%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRUP and ALTL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRUP has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to ALTL (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs ALTL's -31.91%.

On 5-year performance, DRUP leads with 10.93% vs 5.04% for ALTL. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, ALTL has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DRUP has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRUP and ALTL have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

ALTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.

DRUP tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Pacer.

ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRUP and ALTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer