DRUP vs. ALTL
DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) and ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DRUP tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross while ALTL tracks the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRUP returned 10.93%/yr vs 5.04%/yr for ALTL. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
DRUP vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 16.90% return.
DRUP
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
ALTL
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 12.43%
- YTD
- 16.90%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 44.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- —
DRUP vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | -3.24% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 24.82% |
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 16.90% | 16.61% | 12.30% | -15.85% | -10.67% | 45.30% | 33.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRUP and ALTL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.55 |
The correlation between DRUP and ALTL shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DRUP vs. ALTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRUP
ALTL
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DRUP
ALTL
Healthcare
DRUP
ALTL
Communication Services
DRUP
ALTL
Consumer Cyclical
DRUP
ALTL
Financial Services
DRUP
ALTL
Industrials
DRUP
ALTL
Basic Materials
DRUP
-
ALTL
Consumer Defensive
DRUP
-
ALTL
Energy
DRUP
-
ALTL
Real Estate
DRUP
-
ALTL
Utilities
DRUP
-
ALTL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRUP vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank
DRUP
ALTL
DRUP vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRUP | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.44 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 4.60 | -4.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 16.35 | -15.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRUP | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 2.51 | -2.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.28 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.73 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
DRUP vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, roughly equal to the maximum ALTL drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and ALTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRUP | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -31.91% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -9.79% | -13.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -21.21% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -31.91% | +0.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -0.66% | -5.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -11.58% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 2.75% | +6.50% |
Volatility
DRUP vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) have volatilities of 7.48% and 7.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRUP | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 7.26% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 10.97% | +5.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 18.05% | +1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 18.38% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 20.09% | +3.14% |
DRUP vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DRUP and ALTL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
DRUP vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison
DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 0.94% | 0.95% | 1.56% | 1.28% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRUP and ALTL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRUP has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to ALTL (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs ALTL's -31.91%.
On 5-year performance, DRUP leads with 10.93% vs 5.04% for ALTL. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, ALTL has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DRUP has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRUP and ALTL have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
ALTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.
DRUP tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Pacer.
ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRUP and ALTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer