ALTL vs. QTJL

In the year-to-date period, ALTL achieves a -7.63% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 6.31% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ALTL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ALTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTL and QTJL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ALTL drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, roughly equal to the maximum QTJL drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTL and QTJL.

The current volatility for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) is 3.59%, while Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that ALTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.