DRI vs. GIS
DRI (Darden Restaurants, Inc.) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. DRI operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while GIS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, DRI returned 14.58%/yr vs -2.84%/yr for GIS. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DRI vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRI achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -26.66% return. Over the past 10 years, DRI has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 14.58%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -2.84% annualized return.
DRI
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 9.38%
- 6M
- 15.26%
- 1Y
- -5.77%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
GIS
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -26.66%
- 6M
- -25.75%
- 1Y
- -35.44%
- 3Y*
- -23.68%
- 5Y*
- -8.98%
- 10Y*
- -2.84%
DRI vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRI Darden Restaurants, Inc. | 9.38% | 1.56% | 17.70% | 22.83% | -4.84% | 29.48% | 10.45% | 12.29% | 6.89% | 35.99% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -26.66% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRI and GIS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 1995 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
DRI:
$23.14B
GIS:
$17.94B
DRI:
$9.45
GIS:
$4.08
DRI:
20.98
GIS:
8.10
DRI:
1.15
GIS:
3.49
DRI:
1.82
GIS:
0.98
DRI:
11.00
GIS:
1.92
DRI:
$12.76B
GIS:
$18.37B
DRI:
$7.34B
GIS:
$4.70B
DRI:
$1.80B
GIS:
$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRI vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
DRI
GIS
DRI vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRI | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | -1.52 | +1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | -2.21 | +2.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.74 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.98 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | -1.97 | +1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRI | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | -1.52 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | -0.43 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | -0.13 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.42 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
DRI vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRI drawdown since its inception was -72.80%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -58.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRI and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRI | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.80% | -58.61% | -14.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.92% | -36.38% | +12.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.92% | -56.00% | +32.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.38% | -58.61% | +30.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.80% | -58.61% | -14.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.50% | -58.51% | +49.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.00% | -10.25% | -2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.77% | 18.04% | -6.27% |
Volatility
DRI vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS) have volatilities of 6.43% and 6.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRI | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 6.31% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.37% | 18.29% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.71% | 23.46% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 21.06% | +6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.90% | 22.06% | +13.84% |
Dividends
DRI vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
DRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than GIS's 7.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRI Darden Restaurants, Inc. | 3.03% | 3.15% | 2.90% | 3.07% | 3.34% | 2.29% | 0.99% | 2.99% | 2.76% | 2.48% | 2.92% | 13.76% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.38% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Financials
DRI vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Darden Restaurants, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DRI vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
DRI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Darden Restaurants, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 3.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.3%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
DRI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Darden Restaurants, Inc. reported an operating income of 406.40M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
DRI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Darden Restaurants, Inc. reported a net income of 306.80M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DRI and GIS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRI has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to GIS (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRI dropped -72.80% vs GIS's -58.61%.
DRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRI and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer