PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRI vs. SLGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DRI vs. SLGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRI achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than SLGN's 12.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DRI has outperformed SLGN with an annualized return of 15.40%, while SLGN has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.


DRI

1D
-3.70%
1M
-6.24%
6M
-4.59%
YTD
9.39%
1Y
-3.06%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
15.40%

SLGN

1D
-0.09%
1M
9.85%
6M
5.53%
YTD
12.50%
1Y
-16.63%
3Y*
0.08%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
7.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRI vs. SLGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
9.39%1.56%17.70%22.83%-4.84%29.48%10.45%12.29%6.89%35.99%
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
12.50%-21.11%16.80%-11.33%22.68%17.06%21.06%33.55%-18.44%16.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DRI and SLGN is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 1997

0.23

The correlation between DRI and SLGN shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.34 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DRI:

$22.53B

SLGN:

$4.75B

EPS

DRI:

$10.35

SLGN:

$2.67

PE Ratio

DRI:

19.00

SLGN:

16.83

PS Ratio

DRI:

1.74

SLGN:

0.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

DRI:

$13.21B

SLGN:

$6.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DRI:

$9.17B

SLGN:

$1.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

DRI:

$2.34B

SLGN:

$842.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRI vs. SLGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRI
DRI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SLGN
SLGN Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SLGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLGN Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SLGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLGN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRI vs. SLGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRISLGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.93

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

-0.49

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.33

-0.70

+0.36

DRI vs. SLGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRI Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is higher than the SLGN Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRI and SLGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRI vs. SLGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRI drawdown since its inception was -72.80%, smaller than the maximum SLGN drawdown of -86.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRI and SLGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRISLGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.80%

-86.14%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.07%

-34.01%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.92%

-35.03%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.38%

-35.03%

+6.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.80%

-35.03%

-37.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.49%

-19.43%

+9.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.98%

-16.64%

+3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.20%

23.94%

-14.74%

Volatility

DRI vs. SLGN - Volatility Comparison

Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) have volatilities of 7.96% and 8.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRISLGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

8.13%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.58%

21.59%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.63%

33.18%

-7.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.23%

25.92%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.95%

23.94%

+12.01%

Dividends

DRI vs. SLGN - Dividend Comparison

DRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than SLGN's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
3.11%3.15%2.90%3.07%3.34%2.29%0.99%2.99%2.76%2.48%2.92%13.76%
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
1.82%1.98%1.46%1.59%1.23%1.31%1.29%1.42%1.69%1.22%1.33%1.19%

Financials

DRI vs. SLGN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Darden Restaurants, Inc. and Silgan Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
3.72B
1.56B
(DRI) Total Revenue
(SLGN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DRI and SLGN have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLGN has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to DRI (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRI dropped -72.80% vs SLGN's -86.14%.

DRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRI and SLGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer