DRAM vs. VOO
DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. DRAM is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
DRAM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRAM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 64.14%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
DRAM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 151.12% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 14.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRAM and VOO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2026 | 0.59 |
DRAM vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRAM
VOO
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DRAM
VOO
Basic Materials
DRAM
-
VOO
Communication Services
DRAM
-
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
DRAM
-
VOO
Consumer Defensive
DRAM
-
VOO
Energy
DRAM
-
VOO
Financial Services
DRAM
-
VOO
Healthcare
DRAM
-
VOO
Industrials
DRAM
-
VOO
Real Estate
DRAM
-
VOO
Utilities
DRAM
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
DRAM
VOO
DRAM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRAM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 341.95 | 0.89 | +341.06 |
Drawdowns
DRAM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -33.99% | +23.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.70% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -3.69% | +2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility
DRAM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.92% | 11.80% | +62.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.92% | 16.81% | +57.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.92% | 18.01% | +55.91% |
DRAM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRAM and VOO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.
DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.03% for VOO.
Find the right allocation for DRAM and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer