PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DRAM vs. RDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DRAM vs. RDIV

Last updated Aug 6, 2026
Documentation

DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while RDIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. DRAM is actively managed, while RDIV is passively managed. Their -0.33 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RDIV.

Performance

DRAM vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

DRAM

1D
-2.10%
1M
-17.02%
6M
—
YTD
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

RDIV

1D
-0.95%
1M
6.69%
6M
13.77%
YTD
22.82%
1Y
34.65%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
11.10%
ALL TIME*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

DRAM

Roundhill Memory ETF
$4.16B$4.38B$3.61B

RDIV

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
$3.76M$3.03M$4.45M

DRAM vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF		99.04%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF		14.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and RDIV is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

-0.33

DRAM vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DRAM
RDIV

Technology

100.0%
5.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.5%

Communication Services

-

8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

14.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

15.4%

Energy

-

17.0%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

7.6%

Utilities

-

6.4%

Financial Services

-2.3%
19.2%

Technology

DRAM
100.0%
RDIV
5.1%

Basic Materials

DRAM

-

RDIV
0.5%

Communication Services

DRAM

-

RDIV
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DRAM

-

RDIV
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

DRAM

-

RDIV
15.4%

Energy

DRAM

-

RDIV
17.0%

Healthcare

DRAM

-

RDIV
6.8%

Industrials

DRAM

-

RDIV

-

Real Estate

DRAM

-

RDIV
7.6%

Utilities

DRAM

-

RDIV
6.4%

Financial Services

DRAM
-2.3%
RDIV
19.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Roundhill Memory ETF

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF

Often compared with DRAM:
DRAM vs. SMHDRAM vs. MUDRAM vs. SOXXDRAM vs. SOXQDRAM vs. AISDRAM vs. QTUMDRAM vs. EWY
Often compared with RDIV:
RDIV vs. SCHDRDIV vs. VOORDIV vs. AFKRDIV vs. BKERDIV vs. VYMRDIV vs. SPYRDIV vs. VIG

Return for Risk

DRAM vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRAM vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DRAMRDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

2.60

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

3.76

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.45

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

7.18

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

21.79

—

DRAM vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -44.44%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and RDIV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DRAMRDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.44%

-49.97%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-4.84%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-17.91%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-24.89%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-49.97%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.42%

-1.40%

-32.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.32%

-5.79%

-5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

1.60%

—

Volatility

DRAM vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DRAMRDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

4.13%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

9.25%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.91%

13.39%

+86.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

99.91%

17.39%

+82.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.91%

21.84%

+78.07%

DRAM vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRAM vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF		3.45%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

DRAM and RDIV have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while RDIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.39% for RDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAM and RDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer