DNL vs. IDHQ
DNL (WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and IDHQ (Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DNL tracks the WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index while IDHQ tracks the IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DNL returned 8.88%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for IDHQ. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DNL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for IDHQ.
Performance
DNL vs. IDHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNL achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than IDHQ's 24.45% return. Over the past 10 years, DNL has underperformed IDHQ with an annualized return of 8.88%, while IDHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.57% annualized return.
DNL
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
IDHQ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 18.55%
- YTD
- 24.45%
- 1Y
- 35.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
DNL vs. IDHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 10.48% | 17.03% | -0.61% | 17.00% | -22.38% | 16.14% | 18.22% | 36.23% | -14.76% | 31.11% |
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 24.45% | 27.46% | 1.33% | 18.80% | -20.23% | 11.38% | 16.09% | 29.58% | -13.38% | 28.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DNL and IDHQ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2007 | 0.76 |
The correlation between DNL and IDHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DNL vs. IDHQ — Risk / Return Rank
DNL
IDHQ
DNL vs. IDHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DNL | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.32 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.67 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 10.49 | -6.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DNL vs. IDHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, smaller than the maximum IDHQ drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and IDHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNL | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.53% | -73.84% | +29.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -13.44% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.15% | -14.07% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -33.54% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.85% | -33.54% | -1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -2.19% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -21.07% | +10.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.41% | +0.10% |
Volatility
DNL vs. IDHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) is 5.05%, while Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that DNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DNL | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 5.74% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.19% | 18.89% | -2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 20.74% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 17.84% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 17.96% | +0.61% |
DNL vs. IDHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IDHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DNL vs. IDHQ - Dividend Comparison
DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than IDHQ's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.31% | 2.06% | 2.30% | 1.81% | 4.82% | 1.38% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 1.86% | 2.51% | 1.98% |
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 2.03% | 2.46% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 3.33% | 2.10% | 1.60% | 2.10% | 2.67% | 1.68% | 2.36% | 1.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DNL and IDHQ have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDHQ has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to DNL (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNL dropped -44.53% vs IDHQ's -73.84%.
On 10-year performance, IDHQ leads with 10.57% vs 8.88% for DNL. On fees, IDHQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DNL has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDHQ has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDHQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DNL.
IDHQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.31% for DNL.
DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while IDHQ tracks IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DNL and 0.29% for IDHQ.
IDHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DNL and IDHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer