DNL vs. JIG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DNL (WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and JIG (JPMorgan International Growth ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DNL is passively managed, while JIG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DNL returned 3.99%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for JIG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DNL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for JIG.

Performance

DNL vs. JIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNL achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly lower than JIG's 16.02% return.

DNL

• 1D: -2.88%
• 1M: 2.30%
• YTD: 9.98%
• 6M: 9.83%
• 1Y: 17.78%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: 9.60%

JIG

• 1D: -4.08%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 16.02%
• 6M: 15.70%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: 3.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNL vs. JIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	9.98%	17.03%	-0.61%	17.00%	-22.38%	16.14%	28.57%
JIG JPMorgan International Growth ETF	16.02%	20.10%	8.84%	13.00%	-30.57%	6.40%	40.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DNL and JIG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020	0.92

The correlation between DNL and JIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DNL vs. JIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DNL	JIG
Technology	35.1%	24.3%
Consumer Cyclical	18.3%	8.2%
Industrials	15.9%	17.2%
Healthcare	10.1%	2.8%
Communication Services	6.0%	2.4%
Energy	5.8%	0.6%
Financial Services	4.0%	6.3%
Basic Materials	3.2%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	0.7%
Utilities	0.5%	2.4%
Real Estate	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

DNL vs. JIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNL

DNL Risk / Return Rank: 30
DNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
DNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
DNL Omega Ratio Rank: 27
DNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
DNL Martin Ratio Rank: 36

JIG

JIG Risk / Return Rank: 41
JIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
JIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
JIG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
JIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
JIG Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNL vs. JIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DNL	JIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	1.30	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	1.85	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.25	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	2.03	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.12	7.55	-2.43

DNL vs. JIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNL Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the JIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNL and JIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DNL vs. JIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, roughly equal to the maximum JIG drawdown of -43.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and JIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNL	JIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.53%	-43.75%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.42%	-12.94%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.15%	-16.04%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.85%	-43.75%	+8.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-4.08%	+1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.14%	-16.65%	+6.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	3.47%	+0.01%

Volatility

DNL vs. JIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) is 7.18%, while JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that DNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DNL	JIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.18%	9.43%	-2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.15%	18.16%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.79%	20.19%	-1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.42%	19.33%	-0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.61%	19.28%	-0.67%

DNL vs. JIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than JIG's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

DNL vs. JIG - Dividend Comparison

DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than JIG's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	1.66%	2.06%	2.30%	1.81%	4.82%	1.38%	1.76%	1.93%	2.55%	1.86%	2.51%	1.98%
JIG JPMorgan International Growth ETF	1.94%	2.25%	1.70%	1.69%	0.91%	1.35%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DNL and JIG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, DNL and JIG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DNL or JIG?

JIG has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to DNL (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNL dropped -44.53% vs JIG's -43.75%.

Which ETF is better, DNL or JIG?

On 5-year performance, DNL leads with 3.99% vs 3.23% for JIG. On fees, JIG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, DNL has been the lower-risk option at 7.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DNL or JIG?

Over the 5-year period, DNL has performed better with a 3.99% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DNL or JIG?

JIG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DNL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DNL or JIG?

JIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.66% for DNL.

What is the main difference between DNL and JIG?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DNL and 0.55% for JIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.