PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNL vs. IQDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNL vs. IQDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNL achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than IQDG's 6.88% return. Over the past 10 years, DNL has outperformed IQDG with an annualized return of 8.77%, while IQDG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.03% annualized return.


DNL

1D
-0.60%
1M
-1.45%
6M
5.32%
YTD
9.54%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
8.77%
ALL TIME*
5.40%

IQDG

1D
-0.80%
1M
0.30%
6M
2.77%
YTD
6.88%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*
8.03%
ALL TIME*
8.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.15M$1.05M$899.07K
$1.13M$1.22M$2.15M

DNL vs. IQDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.54%17.03%-0.61%17.00%-22.38%16.14%18.22%36.23%-14.76%31.11%
IQDG
WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund
6.88%24.19%-3.38%20.76%-19.97%12.28%16.58%30.03%-16.81%30.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DNL and IQDG is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2016

0.91

The correlation between DNL and IQDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

DNL vs. IQDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DNL
IQDG

Technology

36.9%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

18.2%
19.6%

Industrials

15.6%
19.4%

Healthcare

10.0%
9.4%

Communication Services

6.0%
4.2%

Energy

5.1%
3.7%

Financial Services

3.9%
15.1%

Basic Materials

2.8%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
4.3%

Utilities

0.5%
0.8%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.3%

Technology

DNL
36.9%
IQDG
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DNL
18.2%
IQDG
19.6%

Industrials

DNL
15.6%
IQDG
19.4%

Healthcare

DNL
10.0%
IQDG
9.4%

Communication Services

DNL
6.0%
IQDG
4.2%

Energy

DNL
5.1%
IQDG
3.7%

Financial Services

DNL
3.9%
IQDG
15.1%

Basic Materials

DNL
2.8%
IQDG
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

DNL
1.1%
IQDG
4.3%

Utilities

DNL
0.5%
IQDG
0.8%

Real Estate

DNL
0.0%
IQDG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNL vs. IQDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DNL
DNL Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNL Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

IQDG
IQDG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IQDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DNL vs. IQDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DNLIQDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

1.50

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

5.04

+0.55

DNL vs. IQDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNL Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the IQDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNL and IQDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DNL vs. IQDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, which is greater than IQDG's maximum drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and IQDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLIQDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-34.97%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-12.35%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.15%

-18.12%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-34.97%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.85%

-34.97%

+0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-0.80%

-2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-7.44%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.67%

-0.35%

Volatility

DNL vs. IQDG - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) at 4.61%. This indicates that DNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLIQDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

4.61%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.39%

14.24%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.14%

16.75%

+2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

17.93%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

17.30%

+1.31%

DNL vs. IQDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IQDG's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNL vs. IQDG - Dividend Comparison

DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than IQDG's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.32%2.06%2.30%1.81%4.82%1.38%1.76%1.93%2.55%1.86%2.51%1.98%
IQDG
WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.36%2.28%2.60%1.76%4.18%2.67%1.65%1.95%1.96%1.71%1.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNL and IQDG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNL has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to IQDG (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNL dropped -44.53% vs IQDG's -34.97%.

On 10-year performance, DNL leads with 8.77% vs 8.03% for IQDG. On fees, IQDG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IQDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DNL has performed better with a 8.77% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQDG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DNL.

IQDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.32% for DNL.

DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while IQDG tracks WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DNL and 0.42% for IQDG.

IQDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNL and IQDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer