PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMXF vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMXF vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMXF achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return.


DMXF

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.69%
YTD
11.52%
6M
13.01%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMXF vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
11.52%22.07%3.99%20.52%-19.25%10.90%23.13%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DMXF and VEA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.93

The correlation between DMXF and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DMXF vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DMXF
VEA

Financial Services

31.6%
23.3%

Technology

18.3%
13.8%

Industrials

16.3%
19.2%

Healthcare

10.6%
8.2%

Communication Services

7.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

4.8%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
7.5%

Real Estate

3.9%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
5.6%

Utilities

0.6%
3.3%

Energy

-

5.4%

Financial Services

DMXF
31.6%
VEA
23.3%

Technology

DMXF
18.3%
VEA
13.8%

Industrials

DMXF
16.3%
VEA
19.2%

Healthcare

DMXF
10.6%
VEA
8.2%

Communication Services

DMXF
7.0%
VEA
3.4%

Basic Materials

DMXF
4.8%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DMXF
4.6%
VEA
7.5%

Real Estate

DMXF
3.9%
VEA
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

DMXF
2.3%
VEA
5.6%

Utilities

DMXF
0.6%
VEA
3.3%

Energy

DMXF

-

VEA
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMXF vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMXF
DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMXF vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMXFVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.81

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

10.94

-4.78

DMXF vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMXF and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMXFVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.09

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.58

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.25

+0.41

Drawdowns

DMXF vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMXF drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMXF and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMXFVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.52%

-60.68%

+26.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-11.63%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-13.45%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-29.71%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.90%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-13.29%

+5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.98%

+0.17%

Volatility

DMXF vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) is 5.13%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that DMXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMXFVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

5.66%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

13.32%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

15.66%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

16.55%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

17.36%

-0.11%

DMXF vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMXF has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DMXF vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

DMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
4.35%4.85%2.92%2.29%2.37%1.91%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DMXF and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to DMXF (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMXF dropped -34.52% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.60% vs 6.83% for DMXF. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.60% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for DMXF.

DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DMXF and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMXF and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer