DIVB vs. OUSM
DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) and OUSM (OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVB is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index, while OUSM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVB returned 12.39%/yr vs 8.11%/yr for OUSM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DIVB charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSM.
Performance
DIVB vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVB achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than OUSM's 8.17% return.
DIVB
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 6M
- 16.48%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
OUSM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 12.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVB vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 17.14% | 15.09% | 18.59% | 13.27% | -10.51% | 31.29% | 10.78% | 32.72% | -8.16% | 5.95% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 8.17% | 2.17% | 13.45% | 18.82% | -7.89% | 21.45% | 7.64% | 28.04% | -10.60% | 3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVB and OUSM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DIVB and OUSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVB vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank
DIVB
OUSM
DIVB vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVB | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.16 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 1.31 | +2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.64 | 3.83 | +9.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVB vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVB drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum OUSM drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVB and OUSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVB | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -39.84% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.82% | -9.21% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.45% | -19.44% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -19.44% | -1.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -0.50% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -5.19% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 3.15% | -1.11% |
Volatility
DIVB vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) at 3.31%. This indicates that DIVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVB | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 3.31% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.84% | 9.33% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 13.17% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 16.28% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 18.91% | -0.55% |
DIVB vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSM's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVB vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison
DIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than OUSM's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 2.27% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.52% | 0.37% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 2.04% | 2.09% | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.98% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 2.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVB and OUSM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVB has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to OUSM (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVB dropped -36.93% vs OUSM's -39.84%.
On 5-year performance, DIVB leads with 12.39% vs 8.11% for OUSM. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.
DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 2.04% for OUSM.
DIVB is categorized as Dividend, while OUSM is Small Cap Blend Equities. DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index, while OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for DIVB and 0.48% for OUSM.
DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVB and OUSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer