OUSM vs. OMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).
OUSM and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OUSM is a passively managed fund by O'Shares Investments that tracks the performance of the O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. It was launched on Dec 30, 2016. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both OUSM and OMFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: OUSM or OMFL.
Correlation
The correlation between OUSM and OMFL is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
OUSM vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
OUSM:
1.07
OMFL:
0.91
OUSM:
1.60
OMFL:
1.28
OUSM:
1.19
OMFL:
1.16
OUSM:
1.69
OMFL:
0.96
OUSM:
4.79
OMFL:
2.85
OUSM:
3.22%
OMFL:
4.51%
OUSM:
14.52%
OMFL:
14.11%
OUSM:
-39.84%
OMFL:
-33.24%
OUSM:
-4.98%
OMFL:
-0.37%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than OMFL's 3.80% return.
OUSM
2.24%
1.52%
2.62%
14.57%
10.72%
N/A
OMFL
3.80%
2.20%
14.09%
11.94%
13.23%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OUSM vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
OUSM vs. OMFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
OUSM
OMFL
OUSM vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
OUSM vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison
OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than OMFL's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 1.57% | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.62% | 2.21% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.18% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% |
Drawdowns
OUSM vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
OUSM vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 3.40%. This indicates that OUSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.