PortfoliosLab logo
OUSM vs. OMFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between OUSM and OMFL is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

OUSM vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

OUSM:

0.10

OMFL:

0.08

Sortino Ratio

OUSM:

0.38

OMFL:

0.34

Omega Ratio

OUSM:

1.05

OMFL:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

OUSM:

0.16

OMFL:

0.17

Martin Ratio

OUSM:

0.48

OMFL:

0.52

Ulcer Index

OUSM:

6.30%

OMFL:

5.16%

Daily Std Dev

OUSM:

17.91%

OMFL:

18.10%

Max Drawdown

OUSM:

-39.84%

OMFL:

-33.24%

Current Drawdown

OUSM:

-10.20%

OMFL:

-5.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a -3.38% return, which is significantly lower than OMFL's 0.09% return.


OUSM

YTD

-3.38%

1M

4.25%

6M

-8.98%

1Y

1.84%

5Y*

14.03%

10Y*

N/A

OMFL

YTD

0.09%

1M

3.56%

6M

-2.12%

1Y

1.42%

5Y*

14.18%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OUSM vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

OUSM vs. OMFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OUSM is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OUSM is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OUSM is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OUSM is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OUSM is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OUSM is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

OMFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OMFL is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OMFL is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OMFL is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OMFL is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OMFL is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OMFL is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

OUSM vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current OUSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the OMFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSM and OMFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

OUSM vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison

OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than OMFL's 0.99% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
1.85%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
0.99%1.22%1.37%1.55%0.95%1.48%1.53%1.39%0.32%

Drawdowns

OUSM vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

OUSM vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...