PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIV vs. IMCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIV vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DIV having a 17.66% return and IMCV slightly lower at 17.00%. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed IMCV with an annualized return of 4.23%, while IMCV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return.


DIV

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.37%
6M
9.80%
YTD
17.66%
1Y
21.05%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
4.23%
ALL TIME*
4.94%

IMCV

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.38%
6M
13.07%
YTD
17.00%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
10.97%
ALL TIME*
9.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.26M$4.15M$4.38M
$2.44M$2.33M$2.03M

DIV vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
17.66%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
17.00%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DIV and IMCV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013

0.80

The correlation between DIV and IMCV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIV vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIV
IMCV

Real Estate

21.3%
5.5%

Energy

20.5%
11.4%

Industrials

12.1%
11.6%

Utilities

11.6%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
8.6%

Basic Materials

6.2%
4.8%

Communication Services

6.1%
2.4%

Financial Services

4.0%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
8.4%

Healthcare

3.3%
10.3%

Technology

-

9.3%

Real Estate

DIV
21.3%
IMCV
5.5%

Energy

DIV
20.5%
IMCV
11.4%

Industrials

DIV
12.1%
IMCV
11.6%

Utilities

DIV
11.6%
IMCV
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

DIV
10.8%
IMCV
8.6%

Basic Materials

DIV
6.2%
IMCV
4.8%

Communication Services

DIV
6.1%
IMCV
2.4%

Financial Services

DIV
4.0%
IMCV
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DIV
4.0%
IMCV
8.4%

Healthcare

DIV
3.3%
IMCV
10.3%

Technology

DIV

-

IMCV
9.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIV vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIV vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVIMCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

3.84

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.48

14.72

-3.24

DIV vs. IMCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the IMCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIV and IMCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIV vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and IMCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVIMCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.74%

-64.74%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-6.90%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.33%

-18.63%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-19.87%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.74%

-46.33%

-6.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-1.21%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-8.36%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.80%

-0.04%

Volatility

DIV vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison

Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) have volatilities of 3.25% and 3.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVIMCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

3.23%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

8.15%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

11.59%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

16.52%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

19.55%

-1.55%

DIV vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIV vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than IMCV's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
6.54%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.81%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIV and IMCV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIV has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to IMCV (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs IMCV's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, IMCV leads with 10.97% vs 4.23% for DIV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 10.97% return vs 4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.54%, compared with 1.81% for IMCV.

DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.06% for IMCV.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIV and IMCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer