DIPS vs. CRSH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH).

DIPS and CRSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DIPS is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Jul 23, 2024. CRSH is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on May 1, 2024.

Performance

DIPS vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DIPS vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	8.73%	-31.46%	-23.19%
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	20.49%	-13.40%	-43.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 20.49% return.

DIPS

• 1D: -3.14%
• 1M: 1.75%
• YTD: 8.73%
• 6M: 10.07%
• 1Y: -35.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRSH

• 1D: -3.11%
• 1M: 7.70%
• YTD: 20.49%
• 6M: 22.66%
• 1Y: -25.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIPS vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DIPS and CRSH have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

DIPS

YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF

CRSH

YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

DIPS vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIPS

DIPS Risk / Return Rank: 2
DIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
DIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
DIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
DIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 5

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 4
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIPS vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIPS	CRSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	-0.60	-0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.29	-0.63	-0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.92	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	-0.50	-0.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.89	-0.68	-0.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DIPS vs. CRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the CRSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIPS and CRSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIPS	CRSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.99	-0.60	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.74	-0.63	-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between DIPS and CRSH is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DIPS vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison

DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 65.43%, less than CRSH's 98.84% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	65.43%	96.20%	24.18%
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	98.84%	138.78%	94.25%

Drawdowns

DIPS vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and CRSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIPS	CRSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.99%	-63.68%	+6.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.98%	-48.16%	-1.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.40%	-52.59%	+5.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.53%	-41.89%	+5.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.64%	35.17%	+3.47%

Volatility

DIPS vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) is 7.41%, while YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that DIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIPS	CRSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.41%	8.04%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.56%	23.39%	-2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.57%	42.40%	-6.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.48%	48.40%	-9.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.48%	48.40%	-9.92%