DINT vs. EFAS
DINT (Davis Select International ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DINT is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DINT returned 6.61%/yr vs 12.04%/yr for EFAS. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DINT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.
Performance
DINT vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DINT achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 12.96% return.
DINT
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 5.16%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 23.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- —
EFAS
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- —
DINT vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DINT Davis Select International ETF | 5.16% | 32.66% | 20.56% | 6.73% | -8.56% | -14.93% | 22.78% | 29.39% | -22.38% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 12.96% | 46.83% | 3.07% | 14.65% | -8.00% | 12.75% | -5.42% | 14.60% | -10.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between DINT and EFAS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between DINT and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DINT vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DINT
EFAS
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DINT
EFAS
Industrials
DINT
EFAS
Consumer Cyclical
DINT
EFAS
Consumer Defensive
DINT
EFAS
Basic Materials
DINT
EFAS
Energy
DINT
EFAS
Communication Services
DINT
EFAS
Healthcare
DINT
EFAS
Real Estate
DINT
EFAS
Technology
DINT
EFAS
Utilities
DINT
-
EFAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DINT vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank
DINT
EFAS
DINT vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Select International ETF (DINT) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DINT | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.47 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 5.44 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 14.48 | -8.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DINT | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 2.73 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.78 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.56 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
DINT vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DINT drawdown since its inception was -45.12%, roughly equal to the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DINT and EFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DINT | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.12% | -44.38% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -5.30% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -11.84% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.96% | -28.81% | -11.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -3.01% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.21% | -7.08% | -8.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 1.99% | +2.00% |
Volatility
DINT vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison
Davis Select International ETF (DINT) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.96%. This indicates that DINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DINT | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 2.96% | +4.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.78% | 8.20% | +6.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 10.60% | +7.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 15.59% | +7.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 18.33% | +4.67% |
DINT vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DINT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
DINT vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison
DINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than EFAS's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DINT Davis Select International ETF | 1.58% | 1.67% | 2.34% | 1.75% | 0.37% | 2.15% | 0.27% | 2.58% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 5.05% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DINT and EFAS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DINT has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to EFAS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DINT dropped -45.12% vs EFAS's -44.38%.
On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.04% vs 6.61% for DINT. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 6.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DINT.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 1.58% for DINT.
They also come from different issuers: Davis Advisers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DINT and 0.56% for EFAS.
EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DINT and EFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer