DINT vs. SPDW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DINT (Davis Select International ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DINT is actively managed, while SPDW is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DINT returned 6.51%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for SPDW. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DINT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.

Performance

DINT vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Select International ETF (DINT) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DINT achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 16.78% return.

DINT

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 3.20%
• 1Y: 19.79%
• 3Y*: 19.36%
• 5Y*: 6.51%
• 10Y*: —

SPDW

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: 16.78%
• 6M: 17.39%
• 1Y: 35.21%
• 3Y*: 20.66%
• 5Y*: 10.16%
• 10Y*: 10.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DINT vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DINT Davis Select International ETF	2.33%	32.66%	20.56%	6.73%	-8.56%	-14.93%	22.78%	29.39%	-22.06%
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	16.78%	34.75%	3.55%	17.81%	-15.98%	11.45%	9.90%	22.41%	-12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DINT and SPDW is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2018	0.79

The correlation between DINT and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

DINT vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DINT	SPDW
Consumer Cyclical	30.5%	7.8%
Technology	27.1%	16.8%
Financial Services	21.0%	22.2%
Industrials	6.6%	18.4%
Basic Materials	6.2%	7.3%
Energy	4.9%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	5.4%
Healthcare	2.9%	7.9%
Real Estate	2.5%	2.3%
Communication Services	2.1%	3.9%
Utilities	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

DINT vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DINT

DINT Risk / Return Rank: 31
DINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
DINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
DINT Omega Ratio Rank: 30
DINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
DINT Martin Ratio Rank: 34

SPDW

SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 67
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DINT vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Select International ETF (DINT) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DINT	SPDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	2.15	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	2.94	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.39	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	3.06	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.84	11.85	-7.00

DINT vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DINT and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DINT vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DINT drawdown since its inception was -45.12%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DINT and SPDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DINT	SPDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.12%	-60.02%	+14.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.09%	-11.55%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.50%	-13.53%	-6.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.83%	-30.21%	-9.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.19%	0.00%	-4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.14%	-12.88%	-2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	2.98%	+1.12%

Volatility

DINT vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

Davis Select International ETF (DINT) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) at 6.31%. This indicates that DINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DINT	SPDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	6.31%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.51%	14.25%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.61%	16.46%	+2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.41%	16.65%	+6.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.00%	17.28%	+5.72%

DINT vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DINT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

DINT vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

DINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than SPDW's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DINT Davis Select International ETF	1.63%	1.67%	2.34%	1.75%	0.37%	2.15%	0.27%	2.58%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	4.28%	3.30%	3.19%	2.75%	3.12%	3.04%	1.87%	3.13%	3.08%	1.86%	3.11%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DINT and SPDW in my portfolio?

DINT and SPDW have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DINT or SPDW?

DINT has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to SPDW (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DINT dropped -45.12% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

Which ETF is better, DINT or SPDW?

On 5-year performance, SPDW leads with 10.16% vs 6.51% for DINT. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPDW has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DINT or SPDW?

Over the 5-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 10.16% return vs 6.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DINT or SPDW?

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DINT or SPDW?

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 1.63% for DINT.

What is the main difference between DINT and SPDW?

They also come from different issuers: Davis Advisers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DINT and 0.04% for SPDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.