PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIM vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIM vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIM achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 3.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DIM has outperformed EFAV with an annualized return of 7.90%, while EFAV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.93% annualized return.


DIM

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.84%
YTD
6.96%
6M
9.54%
1Y
20.14%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
7.90%

EFAV

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
3.83%
6M
5.18%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIM vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIM
WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund
6.96%37.25%3.51%15.00%-14.09%9.55%-0.40%19.85%-15.32%28.01%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.83%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DIM and EFAV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.86

The correlation between DIM and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIM vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIM
EFAV

Financial Services

25.0%
19.9%

Industrials

21.5%
15.1%

Real Estate

7.9%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
5.2%

Utilities

7.6%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
11.5%

Basic Materials

5.6%
1.6%

Communication Services

5.5%
9.7%

Energy

5.2%
8.2%

Healthcare

3.8%
12.4%

Technology

3.7%
4.5%

Financial Services

DIM
25.0%
EFAV
19.9%

Industrials

DIM
21.5%
EFAV
15.1%

Real Estate

DIM
7.9%
EFAV
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DIM
7.8%
EFAV
5.2%

Utilities

DIM
7.6%
EFAV
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

DIM
6.4%
EFAV
11.5%

Basic Materials

DIM
5.6%
EFAV
1.6%

Communication Services

DIM
5.5%
EFAV
9.7%

Energy

DIM
5.2%
EFAV
8.2%

Healthcare

DIM
3.8%
EFAV
12.4%

Technology

DIM
3.7%
EFAV
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIM vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIM
DIM Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIM vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIMEFAVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

0.92

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.19

1.33

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.17

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.46

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.26

4.10

+3.16

DIM vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIM and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIMEFAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

0.92

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.53

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.45

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.53

-0.23

Drawdowns

DIM vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIM drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIM and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIMEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.45%

-27.56%

-33.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-6.46%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-8.75%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.71%

-27.46%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.89%

-27.56%

-13.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-5.61%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.63%

-4.77%

-7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.30%

+0.48%

Volatility

DIM vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.17%. This indicates that DIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIMEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.17%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.71%

8.17%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

10.35%

+2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.43%

11.79%

+3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

13.21%

+3.70%

DIM vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIM has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIM vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

DIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIM
WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund
2.85%3.20%3.58%4.62%3.96%3.65%2.53%3.26%3.28%2.57%2.94%2.81%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.08%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIM and EFAV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIM has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to EFAV (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIM dropped -61.45% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 10-year performance, DIM leads with 7.90% vs 5.93% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIM has performed better with a 7.90% return vs 5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DIM.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.85% for DIM.

DIM tracks WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DIM and 0.20% for EFAV.

DIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIM and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer