PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIM vs. PID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIM vs. PID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIM achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 8.06% return. Over the past 10 years, DIM has underperformed PID with an annualized return of 8.54%, while PID has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


DIM

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.21%
6M
6.09%
YTD
11.14%
1Y
21.63%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
8.54%
ALL TIME*
6.35%

PID

1D
-0.89%
1M
3.23%
6M
4.55%
YTD
8.06%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
9.15%
ALL TIME*
5.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$172.44K$195.57K$301.47K
$1.28M$1.81M$1.50M

DIM vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIM
WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund
11.14%37.25%3.51%15.00%-14.09%9.55%-0.40%19.85%-15.32%28.01%
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
8.06%24.45%3.08%14.28%-6.48%24.49%-6.56%25.87%-11.46%19.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DIM and PID is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between DIM and PID has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DIM vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIM
PID

Financial Services

25.8%
18.7%

Industrials

22.2%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
6.5%

Real Estate

7.3%
0.5%

Utilities

7.1%
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
7.1%

Basic Materials

5.4%
3.5%

Communication Services

5.1%
13.5%

Energy

4.6%
10.4%

Technology

4.3%
8.5%

Healthcare

3.7%
8.6%

Financial Services

DIM
25.8%
PID
18.7%

Industrials

DIM
22.2%
PID
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DIM
8.3%
PID
6.5%

Real Estate

DIM
7.3%
PID
0.5%

Utilities

DIM
7.1%
PID
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

DIM
6.3%
PID
7.1%

Basic Materials

DIM
5.4%
PID
3.5%

Communication Services

DIM
5.1%
PID
13.5%

Energy

DIM
4.6%
PID
10.4%

Technology

DIM
4.3%
PID
8.5%

Healthcare

DIM
3.7%
PID
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIM vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIM
DIM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

PID
PID Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIM vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIMPIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.35

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.56

7.45

+0.11

DIM vs. PID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the PID Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIM and PID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIM vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIM drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIM and PID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIMPIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.45%

-66.34%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-7.47%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-11.39%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.71%

-22.97%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.89%

-46.07%

+5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-1.08%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.55%

-12.95%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.35%

+0.56%

Volatility

DIM vs. PID - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.68%. This indicates that DIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIMPIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

2.68%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

7.84%

+3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

9.75%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

13.92%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

17.56%

-1.03%

DIM vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIM has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIM vs. PID - Dividend Comparison

DIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than PID's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIM
WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund
2.98%3.20%3.58%4.62%3.96%3.65%2.53%3.26%3.28%2.57%2.94%2.81%
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
3.45%3.28%3.88%3.31%3.30%3.30%3.16%3.99%3.87%3.46%3.90%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIM and PID have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIM has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to PID (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIM dropped -61.45% vs PID's -66.34%.

On 10-year performance, PID leads with 9.15% vs 8.54% for DIM. On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PID has performed better with a 9.15% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DIM.

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 2.98% for DIM.

DIM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PID is Global Equities. DIM tracks WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Index, while PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DIM and 0.56% for PID.

PID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIM and PID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer