PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIEM vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIEM vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIEM achieves a 32.78% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 6.72% return.


DIEM

1D
-1.37%
1M
12.08%
YTD
32.78%
6M
35.57%
1Y
60.54%
3Y*
28.35%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
6.72%
6M
6.51%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
8.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIEM vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
32.78%30.81%12.29%15.41%-20.61%6.92%1.27%12.23%-11.29%27.61%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
6.72%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DIEM and LVHD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2016

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between DIEM and LVHD has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DIEM vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIEM
LVHD

Technology

40.3%
5.9%

Financial Services

23.3%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
6.8%

Energy

6.0%
6.7%

Communication Services

5.6%
3.8%

Industrials

4.7%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Utilities

4.1%
25.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
18.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
15.0%

Healthcare

0.6%
4.6%

Technology

DIEM
40.3%
LVHD
5.9%

Financial Services

DIEM
23.3%
LVHD
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DIEM
6.7%
LVHD
6.8%

Energy

DIEM
6.0%
LVHD
6.7%

Communication Services

DIEM
5.6%
LVHD
3.8%

Industrials

DIEM
4.7%
LVHD
4.6%

Basic Materials

DIEM
4.2%
LVHD

-

Utilities

DIEM
4.1%
LVHD
25.5%

Consumer Defensive

DIEM
2.9%
LVHD
18.5%

Real Estate

DIEM
1.6%
LVHD
15.0%

Healthcare

DIEM
0.6%
LVHD
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIEM vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIEM vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIEMLVHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.35

1.01

+2.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.26

1.51

+2.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.17

+0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

1.56

+3.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.34

3.98

+16.36

DIEM vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIEM and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIEMLVHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

1.01

+2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.47

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.56

-0.01

Drawdowns

DIEM vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIEM drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, roughly equal to the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEM and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIEMLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.61%

-37.32%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-6.17%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-14.29%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

-16.75%

-16.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.61%

-37.32%

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-4.84%

+3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-4.05%

-5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.42%

+0.57%

Volatility

DIEM vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.86%. This indicates that DIEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIEMLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

2.86%

+5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

6.64%

+9.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.17%

9.52%

+8.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

12.87%

+4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

15.50%

+2.09%

DIEM vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIEM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DIEM vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

DIEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than LVHD's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.30%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.40%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIEM and LVHD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to LVHD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIEM dropped -38.61% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, DIEM leads with 11.49% vs 6.06% for LVHD. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 2.30% for DIEM.

DIEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while LVHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DIEM and 0.27% for LVHD.

DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIEM and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer