DIEM vs. IEMG
DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - DIEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index while IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIEM returned 9.27%/yr vs 10.38%/yr for IEMG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DIEM charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
DIEM vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIEM achieves a 29.85% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 21.95% return. Over the past 10 years, DIEM has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 9.27%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.38% annualized return.
DIEM
- 1D
- -4.97%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 29.85%
- 6M
- 30.75%
- 1Y
- 53.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
IEMG
- 1D
- -5.44%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 21.95%
- 6M
- 22.64%
- 1Y
- 43.66%
- 3Y*
- 22.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
DIEM vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 29.85% | 30.81% | 12.29% | 15.41% | -20.61% | 6.92% | 1.27% | 12.23% | -11.29% | 27.61% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 21.95% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIEM and IEMG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DIEM and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIEM vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
DIEM
IEMG
DIEM vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIEM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.38 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 3.32 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.81 | 12.15 | +4.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIEM vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIEM drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, roughly equal to the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEM and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIEM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.61% | -38.71% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -13.21% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -17.21% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.34% | -35.75% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.61% | -38.71% | +0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.97% | -5.44% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -12.93% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 3.61% | -0.43% |
Volatility
DIEM vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) have volatilities of 12.21% and 12.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIEM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.21% | 12.22% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.22% | 20.14% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.98% | 22.12% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 18.99% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 20.20% | -2.29% |
DIEM vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIEM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DIEM vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
DIEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than IEMG's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 1.63% | 2.99% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 6.31% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 5.98% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.21% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, DIEM and IEMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IEMG has higher volatility (12.22%) compared to DIEM (12.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIEM dropped -38.61% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 10.38% vs 9.27% for DIEM. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 10.38% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DIEM.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 1.63% for DIEM.
DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DIEM and 0.09% for IEMG.
DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIEM and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer