DGT vs. HERD
DGT (State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF) and HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) are both Global Equities funds - DGT tracks the The Global Dow while HERD tracks the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGT returned 13.59%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for HERD. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for HERD.
Performance
DGT vs. HERD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than HERD's 12.05% return.
DGT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 30.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
HERD
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
DGT vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 12.72% | 30.04% | 14.15% | 20.95% | -8.00% | 21.50% | 9.67% | 9.50% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 12.05% | 19.07% | 2.91% | 20.72% | -6.96% | 28.58% | 10.71% | 7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGT and HERD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between DGT and HERD shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DGT vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGT
HERD
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DGT
HERD
Financial Services
DGT
HERD
Industrials
DGT
HERD
Healthcare
DGT
HERD
Consumer Defensive
DGT
HERD
Consumer Cyclical
DGT
HERD
Energy
DGT
HERD
Basic Materials
DGT
HERD
Communication Services
DGT
HERD
Utilities
DGT
HERD
Real Estate
DGT
HERD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGT vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank
DGT
HERD
DGT vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGT | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 2.54 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.58 | 3.56 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 5.19 | -1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 17.73 | -2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGT | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.54 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.56 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.63 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
DGT vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than HERD's maximum drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and HERD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGT | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.36% | -39.41% | -15.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -5.68% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.67% | -18.90% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.18% | -21.60% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.67% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.83% | -4.55% | -9.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 1.66% | +0.40% |
Volatility
DGT vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) at 2.92%. This indicates that DGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGT | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 2.92% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 7.74% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 11.62% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 17.76% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 20.50% | -3.55% |
DGT vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGT vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison
DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than HERD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.83% | 2.53% | 3.15% | 2.66% | 1.97% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 2.37% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 3.13% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGT and HERD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGT has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to HERD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs HERD's -39.41%.
On 5-year performance, DGT leads with 13.59% vs 9.95% for HERD. On fees, DGT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGT has performed better with a 13.59% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.52% for DGT.
DGT tracks The Global Dow, while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.73% for HERD.
DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGT and HERD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer