PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGT vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGT vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DGT having a 13.38% return and VT slightly lower at 13.23%. Over the past 10 years, DGT has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 14.16%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.84% annualized return.


DGT

1D
0.50%
1M
4.18%
YTD
13.38%
6M
15.73%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
23.15%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
14.16%

VT

1D
0.47%
1M
5.22%
YTD
13.23%
6M
14.61%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGT vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
13.38%30.04%14.15%20.95%-8.00%21.50%9.67%22.19%-9.65%24.87%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
13.23%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DGT and VT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008

0.88

The correlation between DGT and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGT vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGT
VT

Technology

17.7%
27.8%

Financial Services

17.1%
15.9%

Industrials

13.9%
12.0%

Healthcare

10.9%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
9.5%

Energy

7.1%
4.3%

Basic Materials

7.1%
4.2%

Communication Services

6.0%
8.3%

Utilities

3.8%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.4%

Technology

DGT
17.7%
VT
27.8%

Financial Services

DGT
17.1%
VT
15.9%

Industrials

DGT
13.9%
VT
12.0%

Healthcare

DGT
10.9%
VT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

DGT
7.6%
VT
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DGT
7.5%
VT
9.5%

Energy

DGT
7.1%
VT
4.3%

Basic Materials

DGT
7.1%
VT
4.2%

Communication Services

DGT
6.0%
VT
8.3%

Utilities

DGT
3.8%
VT
2.7%

Real Estate

DGT
1.4%
VT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGT vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGT
DGT Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGT vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGTVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.67

2.44

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.68

3.36

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.44

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

3.27

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.72

14.59

+1.13

DGT vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGT and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGTVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.44

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.71

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.75

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.44

-0.14

Drawdowns

DGT vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGTVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.36%

-50.27%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

-9.67%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-16.51%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

-26.38%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.40%

-34.24%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-7.02%

-6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.17%

-0.11%

Volatility

DGT vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.75%. This indicates that DGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGTVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

3.75%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

10.13%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

12.67%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

16.04%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

17.23%

-0.28%

DGT vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGT vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than VT's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
2.51%2.78%2.83%2.53%3.15%2.66%1.97%2.76%2.50%1.93%2.31%2.37%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.58%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DGT and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DGT has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to VT (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, DGT leads with 14.16% vs 12.84% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGT has performed better with a 14.16% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.

DGT has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.58% for VT.

DGT tracks The Global Dow, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.06% for VT.

DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGT and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer