PortfoliosLab logo
DGT vs. CGW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DGT and CGW is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

DGT vs. CGW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DGT:

0.83

CGW:

0.10

Sortino Ratio

DGT:

1.37

CGW:

0.43

Omega Ratio

DGT:

1.20

CGW:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

DGT:

1.06

CGW:

0.24

Martin Ratio

DGT:

5.31

CGW:

0.58

Ulcer Index

DGT:

2.93%

CGW:

6.18%

Daily Std Dev

DGT:

16.82%

CGW:

15.83%

Max Drawdown

DGT:

-55.36%

CGW:

-57.24%

Current Drawdown

DGT:

0.00%

CGW:

-1.05%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DGT having a 10.30% return and CGW slightly higher at 10.66%. Over the past 10 years, DGT has outperformed CGW with an annualized return of 10.20%, while CGW has yielded a comparatively lower 8.87% annualized return.


DGT

YTD

10.30%

1M

8.96%

6M

8.98%

1Y

13.85%

5Y*

18.71%

10Y*

10.20%

CGW

YTD

10.66%

1M

7.90%

6M

4.30%

1Y

1.64%

5Y*

13.71%

10Y*

8.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DGT vs. CGW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CGW's 0.57% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DGT vs. CGW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DGT is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DGT is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DGT is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DGT is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DGT is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DGT is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CGW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGW is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGW is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGW is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGW is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGW is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGW is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DGT vs. CGW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the CGW Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGT and CGW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

DGT vs. CGW - Dividend Comparison

DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than CGW's 2.05% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DGT
SPDR Global Dow ETF
2.58%2.83%2.53%3.15%2.66%1.97%2.76%2.50%1.93%2.31%2.37%2.67%
CGW
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
2.05%2.27%1.55%1.45%1.59%1.41%1.48%2.14%1.71%1.65%1.67%1.77%

Drawdowns

DGT vs. CGW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, roughly equal to the maximum CGW drawdown of -57.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and CGW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DGT vs. CGW - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) have volatilities of 3.87% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...