PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGT vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGT vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.25% return.


DGT

1D
0.50%
1M
4.18%
YTD
13.38%
6M
15.73%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
23.15%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
14.16%

KNG

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
2.25%
6M
2.90%
1Y
7.79%
3Y*
7.07%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGT vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
13.38%30.04%14.15%20.95%-8.00%21.50%9.67%22.19%-8.38%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.25%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DGT and KNG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.77

The correlation between DGT and KNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGT vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGT
KNG

Technology

17.7%
4.3%

Financial Services

17.1%
12.7%

Industrials

13.9%
20.3%

Healthcare

10.9%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
5.5%

Energy

7.1%
3.0%

Basic Materials

7.1%
10.2%

Communication Services

6.0%

-

Utilities

3.8%
6.1%

Real Estate

1.4%
4.4%

Technology

DGT
17.7%
KNG
4.3%

Financial Services

DGT
17.1%
KNG
12.7%

Industrials

DGT
13.9%
KNG
20.3%

Healthcare

DGT
10.9%
KNG
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

DGT
7.6%
KNG
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DGT
7.5%
KNG
5.5%

Energy

DGT
7.1%
KNG
3.0%

Basic Materials

DGT
7.1%
KNG
10.2%

Communication Services

DGT
6.0%
KNG

-

Utilities

DGT
3.8%
KNG
6.1%

Real Estate

DGT
1.4%
KNG
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGT vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGT
DGT Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGT vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGTKNGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.67

0.77

+1.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.68

1.20

+2.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.13

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

0.89

+2.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.72

2.33

+13.38

DGT vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGT and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGTKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

0.77

+1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.33

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.49

-0.20

Drawdowns

DGT vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGTKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.36%

-35.12%

-20.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

-8.61%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-14.24%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

-18.20%

-6.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.85%

+5.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-4.13%

-9.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.29%

-1.23%

Volatility

DGT vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.68%. This indicates that DGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGTKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

2.68%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

7.42%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

10.19%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

13.59%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

17.19%

-0.24%

DGT vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGT vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
2.51%2.78%2.83%2.53%3.15%2.66%1.97%2.76%2.50%1.93%2.31%2.37%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGT and KNG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGT has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to KNG (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, DGT leads with 13.84% vs 4.40% for KNG. On fees, DGT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGT has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 4.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 2.51% for DGT.

DGT is categorized as Global Equities, while KNG is Dividend. DGT tracks The Global Dow, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.75% for KNG.

DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGT and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer