PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGT vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGT vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 4.71% return.


DGT

1D
-0.58%
1M
5.01%
YTD
12.72%
6M
14.40%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
14.09%

BDVL

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.91%
YTD
4.71%
6M
5.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGT vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DGT and BDVL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.87

DGT vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGT
BDVL

Technology

17.7%
23.0%

Financial Services

17.1%
13.9%

Industrials

13.9%
15.4%

Healthcare

10.9%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
8.5%

Energy

7.1%
2.8%

Basic Materials

7.1%
2.6%

Communication Services

6.0%
10.7%

Utilities

3.8%
4.8%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.0%

Technology

DGT
17.7%
BDVL
23.0%

Financial Services

DGT
17.1%
BDVL
13.9%

Industrials

DGT
13.9%
BDVL
15.4%

Healthcare

DGT
10.9%
BDVL
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

DGT
7.6%
BDVL
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DGT
7.5%
BDVL
8.5%

Energy

DGT
7.1%
BDVL
2.8%

Basic Materials

DGT
7.1%
BDVL
2.6%

Communication Services

DGT
6.0%
BDVL
10.7%

Utilities

DGT
3.8%
BDVL
4.8%

Real Estate

DGT
1.4%
BDVL
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGT vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGT
DGT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BDVL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGT vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGTBDVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

DGT vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGTBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

1.01

-0.72

Drawdowns

DGT vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGTBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.36%

-7.71%

-47.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.95%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-1.19%

-12.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

Volatility

DGT vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGTBDVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

9.49%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

9.49%

+5.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

9.49%

+7.46%

DGT vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGT vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than BDVL's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
2.66%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
2.52%2.78%2.83%2.53%3.15%2.66%1.97%2.76%2.50%1.93%2.31%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGT and BDVL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.52% for DGT.

DGT tracks The Global Dow, while BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGT and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer