DGT vs. BDVL
DGT (State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds - DGT tracks the The Global Dow while BDVL tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.
Performance
DGT vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 4.71% return.
DGT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 30.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
BDVL
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 4.71%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGT vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 12.72% | 5.71% |
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 4.71% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGT and BDVL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.87 |
DGT vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGT
BDVL
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DGT
BDVL
Financial Services
DGT
BDVL
Industrials
DGT
BDVL
Healthcare
DGT
BDVL
Consumer Defensive
DGT
BDVL
Consumer Cyclical
DGT
BDVL
Energy
DGT
BDVL
Basic Materials
DGT
BDVL
Communication Services
DGT
BDVL
Utilities
DGT
BDVL
Real Estate
DGT
BDVL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGT vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank
DGT
BDVL
DGT vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGT | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGT | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 1.01 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
DGT vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and BDVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGT | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.36% | -7.71% | -47.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.95% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.83% | -1.19% | -12.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | — | — |
Volatility
DGT vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGT | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 9.49% | +2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 9.49% | +5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 9.49% | +7.46% |
DGT vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGT vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison
DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than BDVL's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 2.66% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.83% | 2.53% | 3.15% | 2.66% | 1.97% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGT and BDVL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.52% for DGT.
DGT tracks The Global Dow, while BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.40% for BDVL.
Find the right allocation for DGT and BDVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer