DGRW vs. VYM
DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both Dividend funds - DGRW tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index while VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGRW returned 14.14%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for VYM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
DGRW vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 11.51% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRW has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 14.14%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.98% annualized return.
DGRW
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 16.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 11.51%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 24.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
DGRW vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 6.36% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 24.46% | 13.87% | 29.54% | -5.38% | 26.90% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 11.51% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRW and VYM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013 | 0.91 |
The correlation between DGRW and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRW vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRW
VYM
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
DGRW
VYM
Healthcare
DGRW
VYM
Financial Services
DGRW
VYM
Communication Services
DGRW
VYM
Industrials
DGRW
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
DGRW
VYM
Consumer Defensive
DGRW
VYM
Energy
DGRW
VYM
Basic Materials
DGRW
VYM
Utilities
DGRW
VYM
Real Estate
DGRW
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRW vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
DGRW
VYM
DGRW vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRW | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.42 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 3.61 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | 13.43 | -4.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRW vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRW | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.04% | -56.98% | +24.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -6.69% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.21% | -14.46% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | -15.84% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.04% | -35.21% | +3.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -1.28% | -2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -7.18% | +4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.80% | +0.15% |
Volatility
DGRW vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.02%. This indicates that DGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRW | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 3.02% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.26% | 7.64% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.30% | 10.39% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 13.93% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 16.32% | -0.11% |
DGRW vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRW vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than VYM's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.30% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.30% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRW and VYM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRW has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to VYM (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.14% vs 11.98% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.14% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.30% for DGRW.
DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRW and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer