PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRW vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRW vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.


DGRW

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.10%
6M
8.62%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.15%

MFUS

1D
0.03%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRW vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.10%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%12.12%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.37%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.30%11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRW and MFUS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.90

The correlation between DGRW and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRW vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRW
MFUS

Technology

32.1%
21.8%

Healthcare

12.8%
13.5%

Financial Services

11.3%
12.6%

Communication Services

10.1%
5.3%

Industrials

9.9%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
10.3%

Energy

5.0%
7.0%

Basic Materials

3.3%
2.8%

Utilities

0.2%
1.7%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

DGRW
32.1%
MFUS
21.8%

Healthcare

DGRW
12.8%
MFUS
13.5%

Financial Services

DGRW
11.3%
MFUS
12.6%

Communication Services

DGRW
10.1%
MFUS
5.3%

Industrials

DGRW
9.9%
MFUS
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRW
7.1%
MFUS
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

DGRW
6.7%
MFUS
10.3%

Energy

DGRW
5.0%
MFUS
7.0%

Basic Materials

DGRW
3.3%
MFUS
2.8%

Utilities

DGRW
0.2%
MFUS
1.7%

Real Estate

DGRW

-

MFUS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRW vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRW vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRWMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.47

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

4.41

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.03

18.13

-7.10

DGRW vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRW Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRW and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRWMFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.63

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.86

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.79

+0.07

Drawdowns

DGRW vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRWMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-35.21%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-6.39%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.21%

-15.39%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

-18.22%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

0.00%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-4.00%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.55%

+0.34%

Volatility

DGRW vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is 2.47%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that DGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRWMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

3.19%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

8.22%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.88%

10.72%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

15.03%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

17.35%

-1.14%

DGRW vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRW vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.27%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.36%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRW and MFUS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to DGRW (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs 12.17% for DGRW. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 12.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.27% for DGRW.

DGRW is categorized as Dividend, while MFUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRW and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer