DGRS vs. FNK
DGRS (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and FNK (First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRS is a Quality Factor fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index, while FNK is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGRS returned 9.89%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for FNK. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DGRS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FNK.
Performance
DGRS vs. FNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRS achieves a 24.80% return, which is significantly higher than FNK's 16.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DGRS having a 9.89% annualized return and FNK not far behind at 9.84%.
DGRS
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- YTD
- 24.80%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.74%
FNK
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 16.13%
- 1Y
- 23.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00M | $2.54M | $1.95M | |
| $155.45K | $194.69K | $278.14K |
DGRS vs. FNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 24.80% | -0.43% | 10.40% | 21.16% | -13.11% | 23.11% | 7.86% | 24.20% | -10.75% | 7.25% |
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 16.13% | 5.65% | 6.65% | 21.03% | -7.24% | 33.60% | 1.23% | 20.56% | -14.72% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRS and FNK is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2013 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DGRS and FNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRS vs. FNK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRS
FNK
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Financial Services
DGRS
FNK
Industrials
DGRS
FNK
Consumer Cyclical
DGRS
FNK
Energy
DGRS
FNK
Technology
DGRS
FNK
Basic Materials
DGRS
FNK
Consumer Defensive
DGRS
FNK
Communication Services
DGRS
FNK
Real Estate
DGRS
FNK
Healthcare
DGRS
FNK
Utilities
DGRS
FNK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRS vs. FNK — Risk / Return Rank
DGRS
FNK
DGRS vs. FNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRS | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 2.62 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | 7.80 | +2.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRS vs. FNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, smaller than the maximum FNK drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and FNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRS | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.83% | -50.70% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -9.13% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | -25.16% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -25.16% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.83% | -50.70% | +5.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.87% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -6.78% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 3.06% | -0.04% |
Volatility
DGRS vs. FNK - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRS | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 4.18% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.66% | 9.58% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.99% | 14.68% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 20.89% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.58% | 23.75% | -0.17% |
DGRS vs. FNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FNK's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRS vs. FNK - Dividend Comparison
DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than FNK's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.99% | 2.68% | 2.15% | 2.36% | 2.88% | 2.19% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 1.90% | 1.82% | 2.55% |
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 1.27% | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.76% | 1.40% | 1.38% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRS and FNK have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNK has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to DGRS (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRS dropped -44.83% vs FNK's -50.70%.
On 10-year performance, DGRS leads with 9.89% vs 9.84% for FNK. On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRS has performed better with a 9.89% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNK.
DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.41% for FNK.
DGRS is categorized as Quality Factor, while FNK is Small Cap Value Equities. DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index, while FNK tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.70% for FNK.
DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRS and FNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer