PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRS vs. FNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRS vs. FNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRS achieves a 24.80% return, which is significantly higher than FNK's 16.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DGRS having a 9.89% annualized return and FNK not far behind at 9.84%.


DGRS

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.14%
6M
11.54%
YTD
24.80%
1Y
31.61%
3Y*
14.16%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
9.89%
ALL TIME*
9.74%

FNK

1D
-0.87%
1M
4.11%
6M
6.76%
YTD
16.13%
1Y
23.77%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
9.84%
ALL TIME*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.00M$2.54M$1.95M
$155.45K$194.69K$278.14K

DGRS vs. FNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
24.80%-0.43%10.40%21.16%-13.11%23.11%7.86%24.20%-10.75%7.25%
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
16.13%5.65%6.65%21.03%-7.24%33.60%1.23%20.56%-14.72%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRS and FNK is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2013

0.90

The correlation between DGRS and FNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRS vs. FNK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRS
FNK

Financial Services

25.5%
26.5%

Industrials

19.5%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
16.8%

Energy

10.0%
8.8%

Technology

9.1%
7.1%

Basic Materials

8.0%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
5.3%

Communication Services

2.0%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
7.1%

Healthcare

1.2%
4.4%

Utilities

0.2%
4.9%

Financial Services

DGRS
25.5%
FNK
26.5%

Industrials

DGRS
19.5%
FNK
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRS
16.3%
FNK
16.8%

Energy

DGRS
10.0%
FNK
8.8%

Technology

DGRS
9.1%
FNK
7.1%

Basic Materials

DGRS
8.0%
FNK
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

DGRS
6.5%
FNK
5.3%

Communication Services

DGRS
2.0%
FNK
1.3%

Real Estate

DGRS
1.9%
FNK
7.1%

Healthcare

DGRS
1.2%
FNK
4.4%

Utilities

DGRS
0.2%
FNK
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRS vs. FNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGRS
DGRS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DGRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FNK
FNK Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNK Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNK Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGRS vs. FNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGRSFNKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

2.62

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.48

7.80

+2.68

DGRS vs. FNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the FNK Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRS and FNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRS vs. FNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, smaller than the maximum FNK drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and FNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRSFNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.83%

-50.70%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-9.13%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-25.16%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-25.16%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

-50.70%

+5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.87%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-6.78%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.06%

-0.04%

Volatility

DGRS vs. FNK - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRSFNKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

4.18%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

9.58%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

14.68%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.22%

20.89%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.58%

23.75%

-0.17%

DGRS vs. FNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FNK's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRS vs. FNK - Dividend Comparison

DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than FNK's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.99%2.68%2.15%2.36%2.88%2.19%2.32%2.39%2.64%1.90%1.82%2.55%
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.41%1.53%1.63%1.76%1.66%1.27%1.61%1.82%1.76%1.40%1.38%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRS and FNK have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNK has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to DGRS (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRS dropped -44.83% vs FNK's -50.70%.

On 10-year performance, DGRS leads with 9.89% vs 9.84% for FNK. On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRS has performed better with a 9.89% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNK.

DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.41% for FNK.

DGRS is categorized as Quality Factor, while FNK is Small Cap Value Equities. DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index, while FNK tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.70% for FNK.

DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRS and FNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer